Reply to Stats on polic shootings

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Stats on polic shootings"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] do not see it as a generational problem, but one caused by the way society is built. 
 Poorer areas are more densely populated, local schools are poorly funded because of lower property taxes. 
 The local school does not equip the kids for college (that they do not have funds to go to anyway), but for permanent low wage workers part time unemployed careers 
[/quote]

The poorest schools get lots of federal money.  The poorest schools in FCPS have much smaller classes and many, many more teachers.  Yet, the test scores are still very, very low. It is true that the poorer systems do not have the bells and whistles of the wealthiest systems.  Money is not the issue.

I have taught in the poorest schools.  I have taught the youngest kids.  You cannot imagine how unprepared they are for school.  That is not the government's fault or the school's fault.  It is also not the fault of the child.  It is the fault of the parents.  When a child has never been read to, it is very hard to teach them to read.  You must start with learning how to look at a book--not just teach the ABCs.  When a child comes to school hungry, it is hard to learn.  And, some of these children have parents who have sold their food stamps for cigarettes or alcohol--or worse.  Schools now provide breakfast for those kids.  That is the right thing to do--but schools should not have to do it.  When a child is abused at home or going from house to house--grandma to aunt to mom and back--it is hard to find the security necessary to focus on learning.  Poverty is a huge problem--but so are drugs.  That is the dirty little secret that no one wants to seriously address.  Drugs in the home are damaging our society.  They are keeping kids from having a childhood.  
Kids in the poorest schools have the highest truancy level.  If a child is not in school, you cannot blame the school.[/quote]
So the parents are drug addicts?
I have recently come across research that indicates that it is the lack of pre-schooling.
A good pre-school program was found to vastly benefit the poor kids, (as it also benefits the wealthy kids)
Poor parents are not anti-school or against the kids getting educated, and they do not practice child abuse, but poverty does affect children. 
That having being said, why does a wealthy school have bells and whistles? In your opinion, are they unnecessary?[/quote]

It's accountability.

Graduating from a K-12 school requires little more than just showing up, studying a bit and just doing the work. Asian and jewish kids, regardless of socioeconomic status, tend to do well in school -- not because of racial issues -- but because their parents force them to do their homework and do not accept poor grades.

It seems like poor performing students come from families that don't understand that you have to hold your children accountable for their attendance, work and grades. By the time they are in high school, many of them are years behind their asian, jewish and affluent white peers, and are mentally undisciplined. Those groups get mad at their kids if they come home with a B+.

I remember some kids getting almost straight Fs on their report card. It wasn't because they were dumb; it was because they didn't do the work and their didn't force them to.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics