Reply to Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The adoptive parents went into this well knowing the dad may contest.  They fenagled and skirted around the law and took their chances.  When dad found out 4 months after the birth (the Adoptive parents waited this time to most likely strengthen their claim to the baby).  Dad did contest and rather than give the baby back...they held it up for over 2 years.  The adoptive parents took this baby in a deceptive way and held on to their "purchase" for as long as possible.  They have and are hurting this kid as they are entitled assholes.[/quote]

This is just plain rewriting the facts.

Dad contested AFTER doing NOTHING to have a relationship with the baby.  NOT.ONE.DAMN.THING.  And he initially signed the documents when the birth parents finally found him four months later!  Why you think they somehow knew that he actually wanted to raise this child, when he had done NOTHING to indicate that, is beyond ludicrous.  There was nothing deceptive on the adoptive parents' end.  He changed his mind after the fact. [/quote]

You do know that birth parents do have a time period to change their minds correct?
The bio-mom did a real job on this one...
The adoptive parents knew at 4 months that man wanted his child
Lord have mercy on them all[/quote]

So, do you think that Native Americans rapists should have rights to their offspring?  Cause you seem to think that the 1/256 percentage of Cherokee blood this guy had trumps the fact that he gave up his rights to the child.  Can Indian tribes always petition to control those adoptions?

Dusten Brown abused the system because he changed his mind.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics