Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Has your opinion changed? Who did you think was at fault for the Justin Timberlake/Janet Jackson halftime show?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I always thought it was not intentional, she felt mortified and he was an ass about it, because he just seems to be an ass generally. I think the same now, and also that thankfully we've evolved in terms of attitudes and blaming women for stuff like this, however minor and silly it seems in retrospect.[/quote] We still blame women for a lot and there are still different standards for men and women. White, rich guys—like Justin, get more leeway than anyone else. Why do you think Epstein and his rich mostly male friends did what they did and acted the way they did. Because they are used to not having to be accountable. Andrew Mountbatten Windsor formerly known as Prince and his ex-wife Fergie invited Epstein, Ghislaine, and many other rich and powerfully connected dirtbags to their daughter Beatrice’s 18th birthday party. Because they knew he was a gross pedo but would leave their daughter alone. Spoiled, entitled, horrible people who were the product of horrible parenting and dysfunctional families. And, yes, I am saying that Queen Elizabeth helped create the awful abusive Andrew because he was her favorite and she never held him to account. Because the rules for her son were not the same as the rules for her subjects. [/quote] I actually don't think Queen Elizabeth is responsible for her son's sketchy sex life. Why would you hold a mother accountable for that? Parents of any wealth level do not usually try to dig in to their kids' vacations, friends, sex life, etc. And I think Andrew got some of his job-based roles yanked for attempted influence peddling after the Epstein time frame. And it's quite clear the BRF is full of cheaters. Wealth normalizes that but cheating occurs at all income levels. Most of the cheaters in that family had no shame about it. Again, not something the Queen could do anything about. It's personal behavior not subject to state control. There's speculation her husband cheated but none about her. I think she did a great job as a woman who unexpectedly had a life-changing, life-long responsibility dumped on her shoulders because of an uncle's sketchy love life. Expecting born rich people not to be entitled based on superior parenting is naive [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics