Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "AI/chat gpt is amazing "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]But was the advice better than DCUM?[/quote] +1 [/quote] This generation of AI models is just as smart as the average DCUM poster. The next generation will be as smart as those people who choose not to post to DCUM. [/quote] Unlikely. It's kind of an averagely, averaging predictive technology. It's probably a big bowl of Reddit, Carolyn Hax, Chumplady, etc. And it's not smart at all. We ask the questions. Really wise and reserved people who stay off the Internet haven't produced content that can be fed into these LLMs. Books are often copyrighted so excluded. Unless you want Victorian and Depression era advice mixed in. There's a lot of good advice on the Internet. I prefer to read it as it was written. Not summarized. [/quote] Copyrighted books are not excluded. Haven't you been paying attention to the complaints?[/quote] OK, to get real technical, yes, some models' owners have been caught doing naughty things. But a lot of books are not easily available in text form on the internet. And after the accidentally scraped ones are averaged in who knows how correct/on point the averagely averaged synthesis is. The stuff that's lying around everywhere for the taking is often stuff that's free or less valuable. Including old copyright free stuff. It's clear that AI's do a good job of synthesizing well-trodden ground. And sounding vaguely bullshitty like a generic college graduate. AI's do pretty well with poems for example. I am not here to discuss transformative fair use litigation. My point is that a lot of what AIs train on is generic, uninspiring stuff. I do feel bad for people whose works have been stolen or faked. But in this thread I think we are just discussing the usefulness of AI, not the many ethical quandaries associated with it.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics