Reply to McGill, St. Andrew’s

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "McGill, St. Andrew’s "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My take is this.

No matter how good these schools are in their countries.  They admit US students with much higher acceptance rates.  There will always be a question mark associated with this individual.  [/quote]

Hiring manager in STEM. Always very happy to hire someone with a STEM degree from either of these schools.  They consistently produce capable, knowledgeable graduates. Most tech firms know this and like to hire these students. Can't speak to non-STEM degrees myself because I only hire STEM.

For StA, (a) admission is for a specific degree (so aggregate admissions numbers are meaningless) and (b) academic minimums for acceptance are published online (few unqualified applicants apply at StA, unlike at US colleges). [/quote]

DP. a) they admit over 60% of Americans, there is no discrepancy across degrees that accounts for this. The acceptance rates are much higher across the board and b) the minimums are As or Bs in honors classes and three 4s on APs, with 1320 SAT/28 ACT but that part is optional. So the minimums don’t really tell you that much.

It’s all fine. But per OP’s question, it isn’t that selective for Americans if they meet the minimum, and presumably OP’s kid meets the minimum or he wouldn’t be asking.[/quote]

Maybe dig deeper into the data. It is not a flat 60% across the board. It varies by degree. Some more. Some less. Minimums also vary by degree. Big difference between earning a 4 in AP EnviSci vs 4 in AP Calc BC. Interested folks ought to see the StA website for the details. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics