Reply to 2025-26 MLSN Technical Standards

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "2025-26 MLSN Technical Standards"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Parents of players who’ve had Taka assess their play, what have you learned about the player that was different? Do you think their Taka highlights is an accurate representation of their abilities? Etc.?

[/quote]

I've found it to be pretty good, if a little uneven.  From an individual highlight perspective, I think there are definitely things it misses.  It provides the player with a set of positive and negative highlights based on video submitted by the home team.  Sometimes I don't get a particular play included that I think was a highlight.  And sometimes it even misidentifies a player.  That said, I'd say its a useful tool.  The analysis of team attacking and defending moves seems good, and when you watch it, you can see the names of individuals in the move and what the analysts are crediting in each one.

Also, it's a little inconsistent between games.  From the taka website and the AI summary below, the actual analysis is done by people.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Raw footage analysis: Taka takes raw game footage and uploads it to their proprietary scoring software. 
Expert analysts: Taka employs human analysts who are experts in reviewing sports footage. 
Player identification: Analysts identify players based on their shirt numbers. 
Scoring actions: They then assess every significant action, assigning positive or negative scores based on the impact of the action on the game. 
Highlight generation: These scores are used to identify and create personalized highlights. 
Dynamic CVs: The highlights are organized into dynamic youth soccer CVs, which can be used by athletes to showcase their skills.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics