Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "2025-26 MLSN Technical Standards"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]As much as overemphasis on wins and loses is a development killer, Taka seems like a creativity killer. So the kid who takes the shot and makes it when the Eastern European in a sweat shop watching his film thinks he should have passed it off gets dinged. Or the kid who takes the chance and dribbles that does or does not work out gets negative marks and a red light. Where’s the fun and creativity? Practice is for learning and following the rules. Games should be where kids learn to read the field and try things. The USa doesn’t need bot players.[/quote] That is simply not true. My kid has gotten a lot of highlights from Taka including when the play doesn’t result in anything. Taka will highlight a player who does the following: Dribble (even if only partially successful) Take on 1v1s Position themselves defensively even if they don’t get the ball. Connect a few skills - eg, dribble, 1v1, shot, even if the shot sucks or doesn’t go in Make a shot even if the shot doesn’t go in. Jump up for a header Connect a few passes with another player Complete a pass And so on and so forth I mean the willingness to be creative or do a number of skills is likely why some teams score high on QoP even though they lose so very much. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics