Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Trump and U.S. generals are weighing the use of a tactical nukes against Iran's Fordo facility"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] This entire conversation is stupid. The correct protocol is to use several GBU-57B MOPs instead of just one. There is no need for a tactical nuclear missile, and if someone reports a discussion about using one, I would be VERY WARY of that article. Don't believe everything you read, and for God's sake, please educate yourself on the weaponry at our disposal. [/quote] GBU most likely will not work. Though the Iranians say that want to negotiate AND MAKE A DEAL SIMILAR TO THE DEAL MADE BY OBAMA, THE UNITED NATIONS AND MOST OF EUROPE. This is the correct way forward. F the neocon and pro Israelis crowd. Iran is not actively seeking nuclear weapons. They have not taken steps to produce a nuclear weapon. This has been the case for over a decade. Israel has victory disease and thinks it can get the US to attack Iran. It is time to muzzle Israel. [/quote] Of course. All that highly enriched uranium was just a science experiment, since it has no civilian application. How could we not see the peaceful intent behind such activity, especially when combined with Iran's long-standing dedication to the eradication of Israel, the U.S. and other Western nations which fail to acknowledge the Islamic Republic's wonderfulness? A mere academic exercise, that's surely all those peaceful Islamists have been up to. [/quote] There isn’t a reliable source that said that they were close to a nuclear weapon, even comrade tulsi said so. Of course, the two of them might be getting their propaganda mixed up.[/quote] They are not close to a nuclear bomb, so Israel is manufacturing a false sense of urgency to distract from its Gazan destruction, and it seeking to exploit having a dunce in the White House. BUT ALSO It's obvious to anyone with two neurons to rub together that Iran's ultimate goal is a nuclear bomb. It's practically alone in a Middle East full of hostile nations! Anyone would want a bomb in the same circumstances. AND ALSO Another factor to consider is that at this specific moment in time, Iran is more fragile than usual because its proxies Hamas and Hezbollah have recently been significantly weakened by Israel (using billions of US dollars over many years to invest in Mossad and defense intelligence, as well as weapons). Hezbollah will regroup at some point, the wheel of fortune may change, etc... so is it now or never? BOTTOM LINE : it's not as simple a dilemma as you might expect. [/quote] If you’re Israel. If you’re America, not getting drawn into another Middle Eastern regional conflict based on spotty intelligence is exactly what Trump ran on and probably the only thing MAGA and Democrats agree on (neocons are willing to bomb anything, anywhere for any reason). [/quote] I love the peaceful fella. Democrats are just globalist warmongerers that want protection for all their ventures around the world but don't want to pay for them.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics