Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "175 Billion for a Golden Dome."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pointless unless it can guarantee a near 100% success rate. Which it can’t. Plus, this cost estimate is likely low by at least 5x the estimate. [/quote] Why is it pointless? Is a 50 percent chance of preventing an atomic bomb from detonating over a city not worth an investment? I'm sorry, but this is one area where Obama was dead wrong. A missile defense system can be built and be upgraded over time. Just because technology currently favors the attacker doesn't mean it always will. There was a time when politicians said "the bomber will always get through." That was 100 years ago. [/quote] They are talking about a privately owned and operated (but publicly funded) tracking system run by AI. Brought to you by the same people that have a track record of shuting off Starlink whenever Musk feels like it. This is a bad idea on almost every metric.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
