Anonymous wrote:During WW I, German U-boats feared faulty torpedoes which would circle back and destroy the U-boats themselves. Uri Geller was an Israeli British magician/illusionist who could harness telekinesis, to a surprising extent. The pentagon, which once went whole-hog into remote viewing, ought to look into tampering with missiles in flight turning them into boomerangs which would circle back and destroy their launch sites and launchers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where is DOGE when you need them?
+1. Wouldn’t it be cheaper to just stop pissing everyone off?
Not for the Idiot in Chief.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where is DOGE when you need them?
+1. Wouldn’t it be cheaper to just stop pissing everyone off?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pointless unless it can guarantee a near 100% success rate. Which it can’t.
Plus, this cost estimate is likely low by at least 5x the estimate.
Why is it pointless? Is a 50 percent chance of preventing an atomic bomb from detonating over a city not worth an investment?
I'm sorry, but this is one area where Obama was dead wrong.
A missile defense system can be built and be upgraded over time. Just because technology currently favors the attacker doesn't mean it always will. There was a time when politicians said "the bomber will always get through." That was 100 years ago.