Reply to ADHD Clusters in a classroom

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "ADHD Clusters in a classroom"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]Whose horrible idea[/b] was it to cluster all the ADHD kids together in one classroom? My child has had a HORRIBLE year because of these kids - lots of teachers (not just the homeroom teacher) yelling at the entire class for the behavior of a small group of boys. One or two per room would be fine, but clustering 6-8 ADHD kids together one classroom with a new, young teacher who doesn't know how to manage them is truly cruel to the other students.[/quote]

INCLUSION:  it is the “I” in DEIA.

Now you know whose idea this was.[/quote]

I am pretty sure that inclusion came from SPED law, which predates todays DEI discussion by 50 years. Go back to the 1970's if you want to better understand IEPs and 504 plans. They come from a time where kids where warehoused if they had learning differences and we figured out that was a bad idea. Kids with LDs were far more likely to end up in prison because they had not received an education and were placed in classes where the message was "You are not able to learn" and "you are lesser."

I would argue that the pendulum has swung too far in the other direction now, it is far to hard to discipline kids who are disruptive. We don't do enough to fund programs to support kids with serious emotional and mental issues who still need an education. Inclusion is not the answer for some kids but there are plenty of kids with ADHD and other issues who would be better served if Teachers were allowed to discipline kids and Admin supported them in their efforts. [/quote]

No, that is incorrect.  While an individualized educational plan (IEP) or 504 plan requires public educational institutions to provide a tailored (individualized) education to SPED students, it does not specifically prohibit separate classes or even separate, specialized schools to provide SPED services to identified students.

Rather, fully inclusive education models were brought into force by educational administrators with the intention of moving away from prior seclusion models of special education to the fullest extent practical; the idea being:

- it is to the social benefit of general education students and special education students alike, with the more able students serving as peer models and those less able serving as motivation for general education students to be more fully indoctrinated in empathy and tolerance.

DEI is not the law.  It is an increasingly politically-driven ideology.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics