Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What a disaster. My kid's 504 plan stipulates that he'll get preferential seating next to high-achieving kids. Seating him next to other ADHD kids would be a nightmare.
Wait, what??? Come back to that accommodation: preferential seating next to high achieving kids.
I do not believe this. How could you enforce this without revealing protected information about another student? Let’s say you go to the school to say the 504 is not being followed because your little Pierpont has been seated next to Larlo who you think is not very bright. Are you expecting the school to prove that Larlo really is high achieving to defend themselves against your accusation of not following the 504???
Preferential seating near the teacher is an accommodation. But preferential seating near a particular student? Yeah, no.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They tend to group IEP/504 kids in one class so the special Ed teacher can stay in there most of the day. It sucks.
I hope someone discriminates against your kids, too.
You are sick. What are you talking about, discrimination? I’m the one who wrote this comment. My child has a 504 and is grouped in this class. It is awful to put all kids with IEPs/504s in one class. I don’t agree with it.
Anonymous wrote:Secondary teacher: I have 6-8 in every class period with ADHD 504s. It's become so widespread since I started teaching 20 years ago. I wouldn't be surprised if every class looks like this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They tend to group IEP/504 kids in one class so the special Ed teacher can stay in there most of the day. It sucks.
I hope someone discriminates against your kids, too.
You are sick. What are you talking about, discrimination? I’m the one who wrote this comment. My child has a 504 and is grouped in this class. It is awful to put all kids with IEPs/504s in one class. I don’t agree with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whose horrible idea was it to cluster all the ADHD kids together in one classroom? My child has had a HORRIBLE year because of these kids - lots of teachers (not just the homeroom teacher) yelling at the entire class for the behavior of a small group of boys. One or two per room would be fine, but clustering 6-8 ADHD kids together one classroom with a new, young teacher who doesn't know how to manage them is truly cruel to the other students.
INCLUSION: it is the “I” in DEIA.
Now you know whose idea this was.
I am pretty sure that inclusion came from SPED law, which predates todays DEI discussion by 50 years. Go back to the 1970's if you want to better understand IEPs and 504 plans. They come from a time where kids where warehoused if they had learning differences and we figured out that was a bad idea. Kids with LDs were far more likely to end up in prison because they had not received an education and were placed in classes where the message was "You are not able to learn" and "you are lesser."
I would argue that the pendulum has swung too far in the other direction now, it is far to hard to discipline kids who are disruptive. We don't do enough to fund programs to support kids with serious emotional and mental issues who still need an education. Inclusion is not the answer for some kids but there are plenty of kids with ADHD and other issues who would be better served if Teachers were allowed to discipline kids and Admin supported them in their efforts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whose horrible idea was it to cluster all the ADHD kids together in one classroom? My child has had a HORRIBLE year because of these kids - lots of teachers (not just the homeroom teacher) yelling at the entire class for the behavior of a small group of boys. One or two per room would be fine, but clustering 6-8 ADHD kids together one classroom with a new, young teacher who doesn't know how to manage them is truly cruel to the other students.
INCLUSION: it is the “I” in DEIA.
Now you know whose idea this was.
I am pretty sure that inclusion came from SPED law, which predates todays DEI discussion by 50 years. Go back to the 1970's if you want to better understand IEPs and 504 plans. They come from a time where kids where warehoused if they had learning differences and we figured out that was a bad idea. Kids with LDs were far more likely to end up in prison because they had not received an education and were placed in classes where the message was "You are not able to learn" and "you are lesser."
I would argue that the pendulum has swung too far in the other direction now, it is far to hard to discipline kids who are disruptive. We don't do enough to fund programs to support kids with serious emotional and mental issues who still need an education. Inclusion is not the answer for some kids but there are plenty of kids with ADHD and other issues who would be better served if Teachers were allowed to discipline kids and Admin supported them in their efforts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whose horrible idea was it to cluster all the ADHD kids together in one classroom? My child has had a HORRIBLE year because of these kids - lots of teachers (not just the homeroom teacher) yelling at the entire class for the behavior of a small group of boys. One or two per room would be fine, but clustering 6-8 ADHD kids together one classroom with a new, young teacher who doesn't know how to manage them is truly cruel to the other students.
INCLUSION: it is the “I” in DEIA.
Now you know whose idea this was.
Anonymous wrote:SO many kids are either diagnosed with true adhd or present with adhd symptoms due to poor sleep, poor nutrition, and lack of parental boundaries. The schools can’t do much about it; each class has at least 4-5 disruptive kids. Teach your child how to let some stuff roll off her back and how to advocate for herself when it’s important.
—a teacher and parent
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What a disaster. My kid's 504 plan stipulates that he'll get preferential seating next to high-achieving kids. Seating him next to other ADHD kids would be a nightmare.
Wait, what??? Come back to that accommodation: preferential seating next to high achieving kids.
I do not believe this. How could you enforce this without revealing protected information about another student? Let’s say you go to the school to say the 504 is not being followed because your little Pierpont has been seated next to Larlo who you think is not very bright. Are you expecting the school to prove that Larlo really is high achieving to defend themselves against your accusation of not following the 504???
Preferential seating near the teacher is an accommodation. But preferential seating near a particular student? Yeah, no.
Anonymous wrote:Whose horrible idea was it to cluster all the ADHD kids together in one classroom? My child has had a HORRIBLE year because of these kids - lots of teachers (not just the homeroom teacher) yelling at the entire class for the behavior of a small group of boys. One or two per room would be fine, but clustering 6-8 ADHD kids together one classroom with a new, young teacher who doesn't know how to manage them is truly cruel to the other students.
Anonymous wrote:It’s not that the kids have adhd, but that they have an inexperienced teacher and most likely parents who do not have consequences and are checked out of parenting.