Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Looks like CC Historic District is Dead"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]DP, but the specific intersection at CT and Neb is very low density as is the chevy chase commercial area.[/quote] Maybe that’s why people moved near there.[/quote] Good luck collecting enough tax revenue to cover DCs expenses. The super rich people living in NW DC will move out if you start upzoning this area. Many of these people have no interest in living in a high density neighborhood and they will not tolerate the dramatic changes to their community. The reality of it is the affluent households that pay a disproportionate share of income tax revenues people do not want to want giant apartment building in their neighborhoods and they will leave. The residents that replace them will not come close to making up for this lost tax revenue. [/quote] Well, I bet if you replace one SFH with say two, two unit duplexes (so 4 in total) you likely will generate more overall tax revenue than that one SFH household. The reality is the super rich live in Georgetown, Mass Heights, etc. CC DC is a wealthy but not super rich area. [/quote] The building and its occupants might generate more revenue on an aggregate basis, but expenses to provide services for these additional residents will greatly exceed the cost of the previous SFH. DC will end up losing money on the plex residents because they cost more than they contribute in tax revenue. Unfortunately, most residential development is tax negative. [/quote] You have zero clue what you are talking about. Show any bona fide 3rd party study that supports that most residential development is tax negative. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics