Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Why activism is considered a no no now?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]If we put up barriers to peaceful disagreement, all we are left with is the unpeaceful. Some people have asked why Gaza hasn't gone down the path of South Africa. One obvious reason is that boycott and divestment, the main tool to end Apartheid in South Africa, has been taken off the table by states. 27 states, representing 78% of the population, have laws making it impossible to do business with them if they support boycott or divestment. And when it comes to Wall Street, it means practically no mutual funds can afford to do it. If you punish people for doing the things we take for granted in the American Civil Rights movement, and you punish people for doing things that worked in ending South African Apartheid, what's left? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
