Reply to SCOTUS sided with Christian Web Designer

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS sided with Christian Web Designer"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So, you think it is appropriate for people to be FORCED to make statements in which they don't believe?[/quote]
Do you know what a wedding website is? It has info about hotel blocks and registries. It's not a statement of beliefs. [/quote]

Wedding websites are all different.  This is a custom request.  You don't know what she may be asked to do.  
And, that is what this case is about.  You cannot compel a person to create something against their beliefs.  
Just like I would never create something for a follower of Satan.  And, I would be within my rights to refuse that.  [/quote]
So tell me about the wedding website you saw that would have made someone go against their "beliefs."

We registered at stores x, y, and z.
Hotels are here and here.
Wedding events are this, this, and this.

Is it the pictures of the people you think violate someone's belief? So just acknowledging that a same sex couple EXISTS would violate the web designer's beliefs? [/quote]

Every wedding website I have always seen has a fairly lengthy bio about the couple.  This would likely come under things that are in conflict with one's beliefs.  As would be a custom graphic that she may be asked to do. 
The bottom line is that she cannot simply deny service to people based on their sexual preference.  But, she CAN deny CUSTOM items that would force her to "speak" something she is opposed to.  
[/quote]

and the only thing about the bio that is "against the beliefs" is that instead of "Ann and Dan" it is "Dan and Dan"

Big deal.

:roll:[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics