Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Anyone else turning off the Royal coverage? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I could understand blanket coverage like this in the UK, but I have no idea why American media is covering it so exhaustively. The announcement of her death and that day, ok. The day of her funeral which our President is attending, ok. All this other stuff? No thanks! Didn’t we divorce this institution 246 years ago? [/quote] \ It is history making. Sorry if you are not interested but, it is interesting to people like me who realize that this is the last Queen in our lives and the last monarch to serve this long. It has nothing to do with our war on independence. We have been allies longer than the war. the fact that you all are "over it" is a sad state of affairs in my personal opinion.[/quote] Are you kidding? There is a Queen of Denmark reigning as we speak - she’s been on the throne for 50 years. This Anglophilia is getting very old. The UK is a hot mess of xenophobia and a stagnating economy post- Brexit that is about to tank over winter energy prices. They are nothing to salivate over, but maybe we can see in them the roots of our own white supremacy problems. Nothing is more white supremacist than a Northern European monarchy.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics