Reply to Aniston - Hollywood Reporter

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You guys are such ghouls. Just because she didn’t want to go to extreme lengths like surrogate or egg donor doesn’t mean it wasn’t a “priority” and she doesn’t owe anyone a detailed account of that. [/quote]

She doesn’t owe anyone an explanation…so it’s weird that she continues to bring it up in every.single.interview.

Why???[/quote]

She is asked about it in every interview. She has a very "America's sweetheart" persona, plus the whole Jen vs. Angie narrative that has been going on for decades now, women relate to her as a woman wronged. I think she is generally pretty diplomatic about it, not throwing Brad under the bus as much as she could have, but people want MORE than that.

Personally, I think she was a fence-sitter (like me!) who [i]kinda[/i] wanted a kid, but didn't have any overwhelming biological drive and had a strong vision of what the rest of her life needed to look like before procreation or adoption. I think she wanted to be with someone who wanted a child with HER, and for several reasons, that didn't really happen. I have several friends like this. They're like, "if I get married by 40 and can have a kid, cool. But I'm not doing IVF, I'm not using donor eggs, I'm not getting a surrogate, etc." I think she is that, but the media has driven this narrative for her HARD. I think it's maybe in the past 2 years only she hasn't been on "bump watch" everytime the paps see her in Mexico on the beach leaning over after some guac and margs? They've been ruthless with her. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics