Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
General Parenting Discussion
Reply to "If you had two under two and then had a third"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]First gap 18 months. Second gap 23 months. Then we had a 4th 13 months later. While I wouldn't recommend that we solved the problem of the 3rd one feeling left out. [/quote] This is interesting. Our first two are 19 months apart, we definitely want a third, and possibly a fourth. The thing that's holding us back is my age - I'm 37. So HUGE gaps of like 3+ years are clearly not an option. If you were going to have a fourth, and you knew you didn't have a ton of time, in retrospect, what age gaps would you have done? More even? Stick with a slightly bigger middle gap but leave a little more breathing room before the fourth?[/quote] PP you quoted here. I actually thought the ones closer together were easier. I was in the weeds already so adding in another didn't seem that hard. I do find 18 month olds a bit of terrorists so that with a newborn was the hardest for me. Good luck-- have 4. :) [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
