Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First gap was 21 months. Second gap was 30 months.
Exact same
20 months and 30 months here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First gap 18 months.
Second gap 23 months.
Then we had a 4th 13 months later. While I wouldn't recommend that we solved the problem of the 3rd one feeling left out.
This is interesting. Our first two are 19 months apart, we definitely want a third, and possibly a fourth. The thing that's holding us back is my age - I'm 37. So HUGE gaps of like 3+ years are clearly not an option. If you were going to have a fourth, and you knew you didn't have a ton of time, in retrospect, what age gaps would you have done? More even? Stick with a slightly bigger middle gap but leave a little more breathing room before the fourth?
Anonymous wrote:About 7 minutes. #2 and #3 are twins. I do not suggest this to anyone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:4 years and I am SO SO SO glad. My third is 10 weeks old now.
My first two are 18 months apart.
Now they are 5.5 and 4. Baby is 10 weeks.
I’m loving life. Older boys play together all day and do their own thing. Middle boy isn’t jealous of baby because he just does his own thing or plays with brother.
By contrast, my good friend had her third at the same time but her kids are 4, 2, and 10 weeks.
My life is 100% easier, at least for now.
+1 I have pretty much the exact same spread with my 3 boys, and so happy. The 4 year age gap btw 2 and 3 made my third’s baby years so enjoyable snd easy compared to when I had 2 under two. My boys are all older now, and all 3 get along great.

Anonymous wrote:4 years and I am SO SO SO glad. My third is 10 weeks old now.
My first two are 18 months apart.
Now they are 5.5 and 4. Baby is 10 weeks.
I’m loving life. Older boys play together all day and do their own thing. Middle boy isn’t jealous of baby because he just does his own thing or plays with brother.
By contrast, my good friend had her third at the same time but her kids are 4, 2, and 10 weeks.
My life is 100% easier, at least for now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First gap 18 months.
Second gap 23 months.
Then we had a 4th 13 months later. While I wouldn't recommend that we solved the problem of the 3rd one feeling left out.
This is interesting. Our first two are 19 months apart, we definitely want a third, and possibly a fourth. The thing that's holding us back is my age - I'm 37. So HUGE gaps of like 3+ years are clearly not an option. If you were going to have a fourth, and you knew you didn't have a ton of time, in retrospect, what age gaps would you have done? More even? Stick with a slightly bigger middle gap but leave a little more breathing room before the fourth?
Anonymous wrote:First gap 18 months.
Second gap 23 months.
Then we had a 4th 13 months later. While I wouldn't recommend that we solved the problem of the 3rd one feeling left out.