Reply to New to the area - BRYC or other local travel clubs

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "New to the area - BRYC or other local travel clubs"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If the goal is to eventually play in the GA or the Ecnl, get your foot in the door and go to Bryc or another ga/ecnl club at the younger age groups [/quote]

Question on why you think this?  Logically this makes sense to me, but based on other threads, it sounds like a major complaint of those programs from parents with kids in younger ages is exactly that they recruit over all the kids in the program and get enamored with new shiny toys.  As I said, logically this advice makes sense to me and theoretically those clubs should have more money/more attractive environments to hire better coaches at all ages because of that status, but it just doesn't seem to play out that way.  Forgetting about the ridiculous vitriol and club fighting in other threads, there does seem to be a pattern of older kid recruitment and talk of cherry picking better development elsewhere as opposed to "get in early because the club is great at player development and half the ECNL/GA kids tend to come from their own club".    Any parents out there that have stayed at a club (BRYC or other) a couple years prior to up to ECNL/GA willing to comment on the makeup of the club in year 1 or 2 of GA/ECNL relative to existing club players?  [/quote]

If you look at the make up of the BRYC Boys U14 ECNL team.
approximately

10 players from U10 or younger A team
1 player developed from yheir B team
8 players new to the club at the ECNL of u13 or u14

So the theory of Bryc developing talent is debunked right here. 1 actual player moved up from their B team system to reach ECNL team. 10 were either so much better all the way up from 
u9 to U13 (which shows extreme lack of development by the club for the entire player pool)

The 8 new players were developed by other clubs who might not be an ECNL team for them to play on.

[/quote]

Wouldn't this imply that at least the A team developed talent well enough for effectively all those kids to become ECNL players though?  The 8 new players seems fair in the sense that from 7v7 up to 11v11 you add 6-8 players over time.  I like to see the B team developed too and that's certainly a question/pause, but how does that compare overall.  Too hard to answer, but do "B" or "C" team players at other clubs develop at a higher rate to become ECNL players somewhere?  Or is it a 10-1 ratio as well?  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics