Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "The downside of the DC school lottery "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The system the OP is describing is (I think) pretty close to what DC used to do when each school ran its own lottery. it was a mess. The biggest issue from an economics point of view is that it led to a situation where there could have been a lot of mutually beneficial trades -- which means it was inefficient at allocating a scarce resource. For example under the old system it was entirely possible for the following scenario to take place: KidA gets into MV and has a bad waitlist number for IT, his parents prefer IT KidB gets into IT and has a bad waitlist number for MV, his parents prefer MV Under the new system, that won't happen because the parents will rank their choices and if KidA has a good number, he will rank IT first and get in there. KidB would get into MV with a good number. [/quote] Ding ding ding ding! This is the correct answer. All the rest of you are wrong. OP, you’d need to argue against this suboptimal outcome. You can’t. You lose. All the rest of you are also wrong.[/quote] No, you are wrong. The DC Lottery implementation already requires gaming because only 12 options are listed rather than every option. Also, the "game" is repeated with high positive serial correlation whereas the DC Lottery implementation and associated proofs of efficiency assume only a single "game". And many folks have pointed out that defining efficiency with respect to a single set of ordinal preferences given by parents with limited time and bounded and uneven access to information means that this particular view of evaluating the process is dubious. But hey, abstract economic thought is always perfect, right?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics