Reply to Latin replication pulled from PCSB agenda

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Latin replication pulled from PCSB agenda"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Does it matter? Kids meeting those descriptions are doing ok to well at a bunch of schools across the city.

I want to know more. [b]Is the Latin curriculum engaging to all? [/b]What is the diversity of the teachers and admins a male/female/black/white/latino etc? [/quote]

Does this matter?  Is KIPP’s curriculum engaging to all?[/quote]

If you have more than one subgroup that is clearly under performing against the state standards, shouldn’t everything be on the table for examination? WL isn’t a private prep school. [/quote]

And the many other underperforming charters that appeal only to a subset of students?  I thought one of the purposes of charters is that they can pursue niche strategies for different types of learners?[/quote]

They can, but not if their niche is upper income white kids.  [b]That is not the point of charters.[/b][/quote]

Oh no?  What's the point of charters if it's not to enable families to avoid low-performing and inflexible DCPS program. Who cares who benefits![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics