Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Sports General Discussion
Reply to "Ignorant soccer parents"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I can vouch that it is hard to go from travel to rec. We did both last year, and after the structure of the travel program and the dedication of the players, rec can be frustrating. It's fun, but the girls goof around a lot at practice (if they show up) and are less likely to show up for games, so you end up very short-handed some weekends and praying one more girl will show up so you don't have to forfeit the game. It's one thing for this to happen in kindergarten, but by 3rd grade when everyone's been playing for 4 years, you kind of figure maybe they could buckle down a bit for 2 hours a week. We do love our rec team, though.[/quote] It depends. *Generally*, the rec experience nose-dives at U9 (or whatever age your local club/league starts travel) but then perks back up by U12. The players who are just being pushed out there by their parents are gone, and players who played travel but chose different priorities are back in rec. I'm coaching several former travel players this year at U14. They were initially shocked that so many players in the league were so good. Took an adjustment period. But you can also get a group of kids that goofs off. Again, that's a little less of an issue as you get older -- kids mature (somewhat), and the kids who have no interest in soccer are long gone. Forfeits and short-handed play, though, are a legitimate problem. A lot of these players are playing rec soccer because it's NOT their first priority. (I've seen a few counterexamples in which coaches somehow convince kids and their parents that this is the most important thing in the world.) They'll miss time for basketball, lacrosse, plays, music performances, etc. And a lot of rec-league organizers make it worse. The Vienna approach under the longtime VP of House was to have small rosters because he viewed it as a mortal sin to have players on the bench. The result is that you're often one Scout trip away from asking out-of-shape players to get through all 70 minutes of a full-field game. Rec leagues need more flexible rosters. Maybe ask on the registration form how much of a commitment each player is likely to make and bear that in mind when making the roster. If you put 20 people on a roster, you can probably deal with that one game in which all 20 show up, and you'll be grateful for all the times you have 6-7 players out but can still field a team.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics