Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "I'm wondering what prayer does"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]SO what's the point of praying, if God figured everything out at the creation?[/quote] There's no point to praying at all if you are doing it to ask for something. But people would pray anyway because there is a natural tendency to believe in something perfect which should be worshiped. Descartes described God as the sum of all perfections and said that there is a natural urge to believe in such a Being. Kant said that there is a natural tendency to believe in a Being consisting of solely positive predicates, something of total being. [b] There is a natural urge to worship such a Being.[/b][/quote] For some people, maybe. Just because Descartes said it, doesn't make it true.[/quote] It's not true because Descartes said it, Descartes said it because it's true. So did many other highly regarded theologians, like St. Augustine, St. Boethius, St. Albertus Magnus, St. Thomas Aquinus, Immanuel Kant, and the list goes on and on. Furthermore, it doesn't apply to everyone, of course there are atheists who feel no such natural urge. But people will continue to pray. The vast majority of Christians know absolutely nothing about Christianity. Most have never studied any theology. In fact, the vast majority of Christians have never even red the Bible, only snippets of it. But even those few who have read the Bible have read the King James Version, which is basically one big mistranslation. King James wanted an English version of the Bible which incorporated the beautiful poetic sense of the original, which had been lost in the Great Bible of King Henry VIII. It is certainly true that, in my opinion anyway, King James did produce a version with much more beautiful English than King Henry's version. But he did so by grossly mistranslating the original. All English versions are full of mistranslations because the monks who translated it did not know Hebrew very well. But the King James Version is especially bad because the monks purposely mistranslated it so that the English would read better. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics