Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "GA Case"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Her reputation is shot. The bolded below were actual quotes by the judge taken from the ruling. [twitter]https://twitter.com/WesternLensman/status/1768662185939448162[/twitter] 🚨CNN ADMITS: Finding that there are reasonable questions about whether [Fani Willis] lied under oath — "Would be a career ender for a normal prosecutor." Why isn’t Willis considered a “normal prosecutor?” We know why. Elie Honig: - First of all, there is a, quote, [b]significant appearance of impropriety that infects the prosecution team.[/b] - Second, [b]a tremendous lack in judgment[/b]. - Third, [b]the unprofessional manner of the DA's testimony.[/b] - Fourth, [b]the odor of mendacity remains.[/b] - Fifth, [b]the legally improper speech with the effect to cast racial aspersions on the defendants[/b] - And finally, I think this is the most damning. [b]There are reasonable questions about whether the D.A. testified under truthfully,[/b] any one of these statements by a judge would be a career ender for a normal prosecutor to have an on the record finding that there are reasonable questions about whether you lied under oath. Fani Willis enjoys special privileges that other prosecutors don’t, for a lot of reasons — most importantly because she’s a key player in Get Trump.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics