Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Van Hollen in El Salvador "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]People here said the wife beating was false, surprise it’s not. When it’s proven he is a gang member, then what?[/quote] Unless he had a chance to defend himself in a court of law then nothing has been “proven” at all. You damn fools need to get a basic civics education before you sell out the USA and our constitution. [/quote] He had a hearing in 2019 with evidence showing he was a gang member. He lost because "he failed to present evidence to dispute that assertion" he had a Lawyer at the hearing and lost. The actual documents are here. https://www.justice.gov/ag/media/1396906/dl?inline That was his "chance to defend himself in a court of law". He lost. [/quote] This is a lie. If you have evidence that Mr. Abrego Garcia is now or has ever been a member of a gang, please, please post it here. Otherwise, STFU. [/quote] He didn’t need a hearing to prove he is in a gang to be removed. He is removable because he is an illegal alien. He tried to plead asylum but that failed. He had due process in 2019 but judge declined to give him amnesty.[/quote] He later received a waiver preventing the US from deporting him. He was here legally. No removal order. [/quote] Wrong again. The order was that he couldn’t be taken to El Salvador because he was worried about gang reprisals. It did not grant him asylum in the US and he was still deportable.[/quote] Wait a minute. how are people squaring: - “he was worried about gang reprisals, so he won withholding of removal,” with - “he was never a gang member” ?? Both cannot true simultaneously.[/quote] It’s because of why he would be the target of reprisals. This is IN THE COURT DOCUMENTS. His mother, Cecilia, owns a very successful business in San Salvador. Because of this, he and his family were targeted by gangs. It’s not because he was IN a gang. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics