Reply to If you could know the truth about any unsolved mystery, which would it be?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "If you could know the truth about any unsolved mystery, which would it be?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I feel like Burke accidentally whacking JB too hard is most likely scenario, but what trips me up here is the staging of the body afterward.  I can maybe see the parent(s) applying the duct tape and wrist ties... but not the business with the garotte and the paintbrush, nor can I see a little kid Burke's age coming up with that.  I just can't picture loving parents doing that to their child even as part of staging a crime scene.[/quote]

I just watched the first episode and it doesn’t add up. Her wrists were not lightly bound; but very tight. Those neck wounds from the garret (which took quite a bit of skill). She was alive when the garter was made (her hair was caught in it) and the neck torture occurred at about the same time as the head trauma. The autopsy tells a story of torture, not an accidental wack on the head after she stole a piece of Burke’s pineapple or a “cover up.” Patsy comes across as a complete liar and the Fad comes across as innocent-ish. Burke is clearly autistic but that doesn’t make him a psychopath. I would pick Patsy if it wasn’t for the sexual assault with the paintbrush. It had to be the Dad.[/quote]

And the fact that the police got the DNA results that exonerated all three Ramseys and suppressed that? That DNA was found under her fingernails and on her underwear that belonged to an unidentified male? And that Boulder police planted stories with friendly reporters that were fake implying the Ramseys did it?

[/quote]

Well there is no denying patsy wrote the letter. The letter is the key. So…?[/quote]

Watch the Netflix series. So many “facts” were leaked by Boulder police that were dead false, including that Patsy wrote the note. I’m on the second episode. Everything I thought I knew about the case is wrong. 4 handwriting experts (including one from the FBI) said she didn’t write it. No footprints in the snow! Because there was no snow in back where the window was broken. Biggest of all: The police suppressed the DNA evidence that excluded the family and ID’d an unknown male—on her underpants. Plus her pediatrician said there was zero physical evidence of any prior sexual abuse.[/quote]

To be fair, I am a pediatrician, and you cannot tell from looking at a child whether or not they have been sexually abused. Certainly not during a routine physical exam. Did her pediatrician ever perform an in depth sexual assault exam? It’s unlikely he or she would have been trained and certified to do that. It’s usually performed at a hospital or through social services etc [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics