Reply to Anxiety level going uppppp..

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Anxiety level going uppppp.."

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://x.com/saucebars/status/1853565226068640036/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1853565226068640036&currentTweetUser=saucebars[/twitter][/quote]

Eyeliner totally on point.[/quote]

Eyeliner totally on point is going to wax you in 2028. You better hope JD and Tulsi don’t like each other because a JD / Tusli ticket or vice versa is going to obliterate anything the Dems put up. Trump is 1/10th the political talent that JD is. [/quote]

I guess you are just trying to be funny?[/quote]

Again, name a Republican who had a better debate performance than JD in a VP or Pres debate in the past 20 or even 30 years. [/quote]

I don't consider JD's nonstop slimy lying to be a good debate performance.  Maybe you confused his arrogant smugness with "good."  I don't.[/quote]

No one has answered the question. Your choices are Trump, Pence, Romney, Ryan, McCain, Palin, Bush, and Cheney. And name a specific debate, not just that you like McCain or Romney better.[/quote]

Reagan was certainly a better debater than Vance.  Trump has his sound bites, and an ability to dominate a stage, but lacks depth, interrupts constantly (his opponent as well as himself), Pence was calm and disciplined, good at staying on message but was often evasive and passive.  Romney was polished, articulate and knowledgeable but stiff, Paul Ryan was good on policy and economic issues and a clear communicator but came across as wonky and lacking charisma.  McCain was experienced, straightforward but struggled to make emotional connections  with the audience.  Sarah Palin was charismatic but was out to lunch on policy issues.  George W. Bush was folksy and relatable but struggled with policy.  Dick Cheney had a commanding presence, had some depth of policy knowledge and was an effective debater, but came across as aggressive and too polarizing.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics