Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "MoCo “Attainable Housing” plan and property values"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We don’t need “community input”. That’s a term used to infinitely delay getting things done. You all are the same kind of people that in the workplace like to “shop around ideas” and “socialize” ideas to people before officially pitching them. It’s super inefficient. We already know the good policy outcomes from upzoning. You just need to let it rip and let people do what they please with their land. [/quote] So these people who own that land and should do whatever they want with it -- they bought or inherited it completely unencumbered by zoning, right? I mean, they have every right to expect that the price they paid or valie they inherited was not at all tied to the expected uses, right? And the neighbors -- they all paid for their property without the consideration of nearby zoning, yes? Certainly they did not pay a premium for the expectation of a certain density limitation, right? And we shouldn't have government responsible to those represented, should we? Just install some autocrats, and they'll definitely do what is best, yes? And certainly there are no downsides associated with those "good policy outcomes." And government should operate like a business, right? Because the people represented work for the government the way that employees work for company shareholders, of course. :roll: What a load of crock.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics