Reply to Attack on Petit Scholars daycare staff

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Attack on Petit Scholars daycare staff"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The video made me sick.

This guy doesn’t need “support,” he needs to be permanently separated from society.

If you are defending him, please pick him up and keep him at your house. You can support him. [/quote]

Seriously this is the only sane response.

STFU about supports. Any person committing a heinous act can claim to be mentally ill (bc what same person would do this?) He needs to be away from society, I couldn't care less what happens to him.[/quote]

OK MAGA.[/quote]

A person is MAGA if they think a person with an extensive history of breakdowns that include harrassing people, specifically - sexually harassing people, dating back years, who violently attacked two daycare providers and masturbated in front of 30 daycare children, shouldn't be permanently hospitalized? OK.

Frankly, if DC does this right, they could file a separate charge for each child present, couldn't they?[/quote]

I'm the PP and farthest thing from MAGA. I'm a POC and Democrat.

I also think anyone who is remotely okay with this situation is a complete sicko.

Is the mass shooter in Maine also just having a mental health crisis?[/quote]

Yes, probably. Mentally healthy people don't shoot 30 people or attack day care workers and masturbate in front of children. Recognizing that people are having mental health issues doesn't mean they should be excused for their crimes. Mental health issues this severe require a swift and severe response.[/quote]

Like providing free housing so that the individual has time to "work on their issues." [/quote]

Yes, they should get free housing since they can’t work. But that free housing should be in a secure place away from the rest of society. [/quote]

It's called permanent psychiatric housing and it shouldn't be located in a residential neighborhood.  It's not that difficult.[/quote]

Permanent psychiatric housing on an involuntary basis is not constitutional.

When are you going to realize that the judicial system is sandbagging this country?[/quote]

What? Long sentences in jail for committing actual crimes like this guy did are obviously "constitutional." And some of that time can be receiving psychiatric care or whatever in a fully contained treatment facility.

This isn't about someone with mental issues just in their head. This is a criminal who can be punished.[/quote]

[b]So then why did MPD refuse to arrest him multiple times before[/b] (per local residents complaining) and the USAO refused to charge him with crimes?

No one has a plausible answer for this. [/quote]

Who knows but a very good question. I assume Parker's staff may be reading these posts. So let's put the question to the Councilman -- why did MPD refuse to arrest this aggressively dangerous person multiple times before? In fact, we should be asking all Councilmembers to investigate the number of repeated reports of dangerous behavior and the outcomes of these reports - are there arrests, prosecution, anything?[/quote]

In order to arrest him it would have escalated and required the police to go hands on.  In the post George Floyd environment few officers are going hands on unless their life or another officers safety is at risk.  This is what the people of DC wanted.  [/quote]

+1 and I don’t blame them one single bit. Any officer involved would have their name and face plastered all over the Internet, their reputation dragged, and they would be labeled as racist.

DC voters wanted this. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics