Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Wilson honors for all - how has it worked?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Just stop. I think the HFA is admirable but lets not deceive ourselves that it is as rigorous as an honors class when non-honors is also offered. My dc transferred into Wilson from a private this year where she took honors classes. I asked her opinion, based on her[b] actual experience[/b], on the rigor of the honors class at her private compared to Wilson. She said [b]the private was more rigorous[/b] and the teachers made a point of saying they were doing x,y,z because it was an honors class and would be taught as such. The students were expected to keep up and were only in the class because a determination was made they could do the work at that level. Again, what Wilson is attempting is admirable but to think they are meeting all students academic needs with this model is ridiculous. [/quote] What your daughter's experience shows is that private school honors classes are more rigorous than Wilson honors classes. Not a big shock. What it doesn't show is what we're actually discussing --- the difference, if any, between an honors class at Wilson pre-HFA and the same class now under HFA. The Wilson honors curriculum is the same. The Wilson honors class syllabus is the same. Posters with experience of the process AT WILSON are telling you that teachers are going out of their way to make the classes the same. Because your daughter took some other honors class at some other school at some point in time, you believe you know better than people with experience of what's happening AT WILSON. That's not convincing to me, but go for it.[/quote] Please identify yourself. You are very invested in selling your narrative that I think you must be an insider. If so, why not say who you are to give credence to what you are saying? Otherwise, you just have an opinion like everyone else commenting here. Shame, but I am certain you won't do so. [/quote] I'm the parent of a Wilson junior. I'm involved with sports stuff but not much with academic stuff (beyond going to parent meetings, back to school night and conferences). In addition to what you quoted, I also posted the FAQ. I have zero knowledge based on being an "insider" (SMH). I read the FAQ, I read the school newsletters (which are terribly written and kind of looney), and that's where I get my information --- all public sources equally available to everyone on DCUM. I have grave doubts about HFA (I posted about my kid being distracted in an AP class this year because all but a few kids are not engaged and about a kid I know having to leave Wilson due to failing honors biology). I posted what you quoted above because I think it's silly for parents to invent crises ("the content is being dumbed down, oh the horror!") without spending ten seconds on Google to find easily located public information about what's really happening. The school has stated repeatedly that the content of honors classes is not being dumbed down (the FAQ says that explicitly, except it says "dummied down" and gives an example of one metric used to make sure this is the case -- lexile scores). Why are so many parents so invested in insisting on no evidence whatsoever that this is untrue? Or maybe they have some inside information I don't? :roll: [/quote] To above poster, see the reply below. You adamantly say it won’t be dumb down because why? Because the admin at Wilson says so? Their word is the be all you say? Just like DCPS has promised things bit don’t deliver? There is ideology and there is reality. You have no concrete proof the rigor will be less. “Disagree. The honors classes at her school are more rigorous because there are hard expectations and standards of what the class will cover and the students who were there could do the work. So let’s just read in between the lines of this poster and say it for what it is. Wilson is eliminating regular classes which is the lowest level and putting everyone who are not in the AP classes into this HFA classes. Admin is asserting the curriculum and content will be the same rigor. I call that BS. The teachers will attempt it but won’t work with throwing kids who should be in the regular class into the honors class. Because we know DCPS won’t fail those kids who can’t keep up. So there will be grade inflation or the rigor of the course won’t be taught at the level it should. This is how it’s going to play out.”[/quote] [quote]You have no concrete proof the rigor will be less.[/quote] I think you meant "[b]that the rigor will be the same.[/b] " Parents on this thread are asserting something with no evidence. That assertion is directly contradicted by policy statements from people who actually work with this day to day, with a concrete example of a sample metric used to ensure that what they are saying is true. I choose to believe the policy absent any evidence to the contrary. It's not up to me to come up with concrete proof to disprove your baseless assertions. [quote]So let’s just read in between the lines of this poster[/quote] No thanks, I choose to take things at face value. [quote]Because we know DCPS won’t fail those kids who can’t keep up.[/quote] I believe a previous poster posted a link to evidence that grades have gone way down. As I've said several times, one of my reservations with HFA is that a kid I know who DID fail, and I think that's too bad -- he could have passed an on level class. [quote]So there will be grade inflation or the rigor of the course won’t be taught at the level it should. This is how it’s going to play out.[/quote] This kind of conspiracy theorizing and predicting the future is not convincing to me. [/quote] NP, 1 example of a concrete metric and 1 case of someone who did fail is far from proving it will work. But you can believe what you want. As to you saying the last statement is conspiracy theorizing......well just talk to hundreds of EOTP families with advance students being in class with kids 2 grades below them because there is no tracking and everyone is grouped all together their experiences. Read the hundreds of threads on this site about parents supplementing because their child is not challenge. .[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics