Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I will offer a contrarian view. Trump suffers from a form of narcissistic personality disorder. He was the president and who was anyone else to tell him that he wasn’t allowed to keep “his documents” relating to something he may have considered to be a success of his presidency. So he started to hoard things — including classified materials — with the thought that successive administrations would not give him the credit he thought he deserved. Was it unlawful? Yes. Was it incredibly irresponsible? Yes. Did he put US secrets at risk? Almost certainly. Has he improperly shared classified information in the past? No doubt. But do I think he was selling national intelligence secrets? No. Has this been the case, DOJ would not have handled the matter with the care and patience it did. It would come as no surprise to anyone that Trump did not turn over presidential records that became the property of NARA on 1/20/21. Something like the infamous Sharpie hurricane map. It was no secret he had aides remove boxes from the West Wing to the residence during the course of January. And senior staff attempted to discuss his legal obligations to surrender documents during that same period. After repeated efforts to recover the documents, a grand jury was empaneled to subpoena the missing presidential records. Only then was there a recognition that Trump had taken voluminous classified material. And it would subsequently be discovered that his attorneys lied about the possession of such material all-the-while there was no meaningful effort to secure material tossed in boxes with raincoats and golf balls. But Trump was fully aware of the importance of some of the material. It’s the reason that boxes continued to be moved in and out of the storage area and some were found in the closet of his private office suite. But we still have no indication that Trump was seeking to affirmatively misuse the material for personal or political gain. The time allowed to pass between May and August doesn’t seem to support this was the case. Nonetheless the counterintelligence professionals couldn’t have been happy about Orban visiting MAL earlier in the month and other foreign contacts that have not been made public. Let’s hope this was ultimately more a matter of securing positive control over the material and not something more sinister.[/quote] I don’t even know what to say to this. [/quote] DP and let me caveat that I hate Trump. I think he is a dangerous authoritarian. I believe January 6th and the efforts around it were an attempted coup/autogolpe. But I agree with the PP's assessment. I don't think Trump cares one bit about this country or about IC safeguards or the like. But I also don't find it plausible that he was feeding information to a foreign intelligence service on any sort of routinized basis. He's too erratic to take direction from anyone. I think the danger is actually that a foreign intelligence service recruits/co-opts a staffer, or plants someone and that person leverages their access to get Trump to share information or documents. I absolutely think Trump should be in jail for improperly handling classified, or at least charged and fined. Plus the taking of records he didn't have a right to take. It's completely possible that the records at Mar a Lago were exposed to people that shouldn't have had access to them. I just don't really buy all these crazy stories that Trump exposed assets! Or Trump gave up nuclear information! It makes for good stories, but I wonder if you have people that are expecting Trump faces treason charges and when he doesn't they lose even more faith in our government and judicial system. I don't think it's a healthy information environment. [/quote] You're off your rocker. Just look at the three very reasonable crimes laid out in the warrant. That's it. There's no bloody treason. Those three are serious enough, and can be proved. ***Trump does not need to have monetized his information to be jailed*** ***Trump does not need to have INTENDED to sell out agents to EFFECTIVELY sell them out!*** Same thing for nuclear secrets. Multiple average people have already come forward to say that while guests of Trump, they were shown documents that looked confidential (exact classification uncertain). That's what he does!!! He cannot live by himself. He has to live at a club with the constant adulation of guests. The way he feeds that adulation is to show them things no one else can show them. He has a pathological need for recognition and it leads him to share national security docs with all and sundry. And we already know a Chinese agent was apprehended at Mar-a-Lago at one point. It's obvious there were many more spies. The obvious scenario is that he showed compromising agent information to someone from the other side, without even thinking he was putting anyone in danger. He may have also done this with nuclear info. The other obvious scenario is that his staff has either done the same thing or monetized the information for their own gain (cough-Kushner). IT'S ALL JAIL-WORTHY. [/quote] DP. Interestingly, the FBI's search affidavit lists all the classified handling markings on the documents they seized. The marking that is used for nuclear was not on the list. There are other very concerning markings, but not the ones for nuclear. [/quote] Us nuclear. Foreign nuclear can fall under the codes[/quote] No, that isnt how it works. Atomic bombs are based on physics. Physics are the same in the US as in foreign nations. It would be irrational to classify our own stuff from our own people, but be less restrictive about other programs. All atomic secrets fall under certain markings that were not on the list. [/quote] Huh? There's a wide range of nuclear documents that don't involve physics. Information about our nuclear weapons are indeed classified differently than information about other countries weapons or programs.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics