Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "VHSL Boys Lacrosse 2026 Season"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What elite defenses has Madison played other than Robinson and Stab?[/quote] How many are there?[/quote] Same data - Opponent-adjusted defensive rating Robinson — 75.79 Madison — 75.72 Independence — 74.61 Oakton — 72.13 Yorktown — 71.42 Battlefield — 69.18 Chantilly — 66.36 Raw goals allowed per game in the same sample Madison: 3.63 Robinson: 3.80 Independence: 3.80 Battlefield: 4.88 Oakton: 6.70 Yorktown: 7.60 Chantilly: 11.09[/quote] How did you come up with these? Why is the offensive score in the teens and the defensive scores in the 60s and 70s. [/quote] I used the LN data on the 6a teams ratings, then took the game by game results of the top teams in discussion and came up with an opponent-adjusted offensive and defensive scale, but I didn't take the time to make them consistent. I should have done that so the O and D versions were more comparable, based on goals. I've done that now. Adj Off, best to worst Independence — 16.89 Yorktown — 13.60 Robinson — 13.56 Madison — 11.83 Chantilly — 11.29 Battlefield — 11.14 Oakton — 9.31 Adj Def, best to worst (lower goals allowed is better) Robinson — 2.74 Madison — 2.80 Independence — 3.91 Oakton — 6.39 Yorktown — 7.10 Battlefield — 7.43 Chantilly — 12.16[/quote] What’s an opponent adjusted scale and why have the team orders changed again lol This is a mess[/quote] Do you not understand the difference between offense and defense?[/quote] Lololol really man You wrote: Quickly threw together an opponent-adjusted offensive rating: Independence — 17.66 Yorktown — 13.55 Battlefield — 13.12 Robinson — 13.01 Chantilly — 12.37 Madison — 11.50 Oakton — 9.22 Shorthand from this version of the model: Elite scoring case: Independence Very strong: Yorktown, Battlefield, Robinson Solid but less explosive: Chantilly, Madison More grindy: Oakton Then you wrote: Adj Off, best to worst Independence — 16.89 Yorktown — 13.60 Robinson — 13.56 Madison — 11.83 Chantilly — 11.29 Battlefield — 11.14 Oakton — 9.31 Just making stuff up [/quote] Look, you didn't read and you're dumb. " I didn't take the time to make them consistent. I should have done that so the O and D versions were more comparable, based on goals." I literally explained this to you. I can't effing spoon feed the luddites because you can't read. You don't understand math and numbers, but also you can't read. [/quote] So the offense from one post to the next is inconsistent because you made them based on goals…to make them comparable with the defense? Ok. How does that work when not every team has played the same number of games? [/quote] It's an average. It accounts for the number of games played.[/quote] If the first rendition wasn’t based on goals, what was the scoring?[/quote] It wasn't expressed as a measure of goals, it was an index rating (hence being in the 60s and 70s). I made it consistent so people could look at the two measures (averages, basically, that are opponent adjusted) to make it more apples to apples. [/quote] Not the defense, the offense - why is the order different? What data caused teams to reorder if it wasn’t goals per game? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics