Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "2014G"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]NVA, Mclean, SYC, VDA, and Arlington are all going to be basically the same caliber of team whith FVU being a notch below if the core of their talent is coming from valor. Not that bad but not good enough to make the team consistently competitive with those I listed. Still, theyll be able to grab a few wins against teams like Arlington in local tourneys and league play because even those better teams are not dominant teams. 2013s have better talent. [/quote]How can a team with 3-5 players from Valor plus kids who didn’t make other teams be just a notch below? Especially when everyone is saying MV is a bad coach. Also, is 2013 better talent or more distributed? You have no way of comparing 2013 vs 2014, especially with the age change.[/quote] because most of those teams only have 5 ‘top’ players. Rosters for NVA, SYC, Mclean, and Arlington are already at 14-18 and the lesser skilled players on all the rosters arent leaving or getting replaced by other lesser skilled players. All teams will carry interchangable lesser skilled players. FVU will be no different. Unless a group of highly skilled players actively leave together from one team to another team, most of those clubs will remain the same plus or minus a q4 who is exceptional, and not much changes. Id say VDA and FVU have more upside for potential because of the more fresh start and ability to choose players that havent been at the club for 3 years. [/quote] Choose players from where though? Agreed that the GA teams set from existing rosters really just means adding a GA label to an existing team.[/quote] from every other club not previously listed. GFR, Alex, TSJ, VRSC, And the remaining Union clubs. the bottom half of most of the top teams are interchangable and there is no shortage of players to take those slots.[/quote]Yes, the point is they (FVU) won’t be competitive. [/quote] Not true. Plenty of players are club hopping for next year. Strong existing teams can only have so many superstars, so other strong players who are not getting that attention are looking. FVU also does not bloat rosters compared to most so playing time is better. [/quote]Well now we all know you don’t know what you are talking about. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics