Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Without affirmative action, elite colleges are prioritizing economic diversity in admissions"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Lot of angry losers who thought SCOTUS was handing Ivy slots to their kids that just can’t make the grade.[/quote] Let's do the math. In 2022 the SAT test taker demographics were as follows (from https://reports.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/20...ts-annual-report.pdf) 175,468 Asians 201,645 Black/African Americans 396,422 Hispanic/Latino 732,946 White In 2020, the percentage of takers getting a 1500+/1400+ (respectively) by race were: 9%/23% of Asians <1%/1% of Black/African Americans <1%/2% of Hispanics/Latinos 2%/7% of Whites That means that among the pool of people getting 1500/1400+ (rounding <1% to 0.5%): 15,792/40,357 are Asian 1,008/2,016 are Black 1,982/7,928 are Hispanic 14,658/51,306 are White They're not getting mad, they're getting theirs[/quote] Since almost all schools superscore, you are grossly underestimating the numbers of kids with higher scores…the discrepancy, while undoubtedly large, also would be smaller because, on average, Asians take the test more times, even than whites - and blacks the least.[/quote] If this data is correct , The ivy league would be Asian - 50% White - 46% Hispanic - 3% Black - 1%[/quote] If they went purely on academics, yes[/quote] White people want enough academics to eliminate blacks and Hispanics but not so much academics as to eliminate them. So it’s kind of like merit-lite. [/quote] Pretty sure that isn't the case. SFFA had to recruit Asians for SFFA v Harvard because they could not get any white candidates to sign on.[/quote] They tried with white plaintiffs in the Texas case. SFFA was entirely about discrimination against asians. They didn't use white plaintiffs because they couldn't show discrimination against white plaintiffs compared to asians. They could show discrimination against asians compared to whites.[/quote] They ran ads trying to get both but were unsuccessful in getting anyone white to sign on. The Texas case was a dog, the girl wasn’t a good example of anything.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics