Reply to Van Hollen in El Salvador

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Van Hollen in El Salvador "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yikes this looks worse and worse:

But a 2021 petition for protection from domestic violence filled out by Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez, which was obtained first by DailyMail.com, states that the alleged MS-13 member beat his wife multiple times over the years.

In November 2020, Abrego Garcia hit Vasquez with his work boots, and in August 2020 he hit her in the eye, causing her to get a black eye, according to her petition.

That same day Abrego Garcia started driving quickly, scaring his wife, as their one-year-old was in the back seat. 'In the recording you can hear him yelling, insulting me, driving extreme fast,' Vasquez told authorities.

Later that day she left the residence they shared after being 'afraid to be close to him,' her request continued.

- Daily Mail[/quote]

That’s really bad.

Multiple violent assaults on his wife for 3 years?  Endangering their infant child??

I am no longer on this guy’s side.  He should stay in his country.[/quote]

Sigh. None of this is about being on any side. People are upset because our POTUS is grossly overriding due process and failing to adhere to rule of law.

I am on the constitution’s side. [/quote]

The constitution has nothing to say about this case. Trump hasn’t violated any court order.[/quote]

SCOTUS told the gubmint to facilitate the man's return to the USA. That has not happened. The government is in violation of a SCOTUS order. [/quote]

Wrong. SCOTUS told the judge to clarify her order especially in terms of “effectuate” with respect for the executive branch. She still hasn’t done so. SCOTUS never mandated a return of Garcia to the US. It mandated “facilitate” a release IN ES.[/quote]

Keep reading, you are missing the second half of the sentence on what the government has to facilitate.[/quote]

A release IN El Salvador

Not a return. Return is never used for a reason. SCOTUS didn’t demand a specific outcome.

And if you keep trading even further, you see the wording about deference to article 2 powers. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics