Reply to FCV 2007

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "FCV 2007"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The ECNL mid Atlantic conf has many poor teams. Why is this being ignored?

The NC and SC teams are not very good with maybe one exception.  Too many teams and the talent is watered down.

Let's not talk about a few of the more local teams. ouch[/quote]

You don't have a clue. Let's look at overall stats of both 07 conferences:

Teams in top 100:                       ECNL MA: 36% (5 teams);       GA MA:  10% (1 team)

Teams in top 125:                       ECNL MA: 50% (7 teams);        GA MA:  20% (2 teams)

Teams in top 200:                       ECNL MA: 72% (10 teams);      GA MA:  50% (5 teams)

[b]Teams OUTSIDE TOP 300[/b]             ECNL MA: 14% (2 teams);       [b]GA MA:[/b]  [b]40%[/b] (4 teams).....one of which FVC tied 4-4......

NC/SC in the 07 MA ECNL have 6 teams in top 150 and only 1 outside top 300 (NCFC). Safe to say that outside of NCFC and BRYC, ECNL MA is very strong and teams are getting really good competition week in and week out.

Youth Soccer Rankings of teams in both conferences (ECNL teams in bold):
[b]VA Union	            25[/b]
FCV                       37
[b]Charlotte SA	    82[/b]
[b]NC Courage	    83
Loudoun	            86
Charlotte Indep	    90
Wilmington	  102
CESA	          112[/b]
Balt Armour	  114
Balt Celt	          134
[b]NC  Fusion	          137[/b]
Phil Ukran	          153
[b]Arlington	          190[/b]
SJEB	                  190
[b]Richmond	          199[/b]
Cedar Stars	  224
[b]VDA	                  247
SC	                  292[/b]
PA Classics	  317
[b]NCFC	          392[/b]
Skyline	          427
Metro	          479
Sporting DE	  598
[b]BRYC	          627[/b][/quote]

Go back to being a CCL dad[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics