Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Hint: it’s related to that heist pulled off in Spring of 2020
FCV didn't give out refunds either.
Did FCV also wait until the 91st day (bypassing credit card companies standard 90 day for reimbursement deadline) until they came out with their lame and sorry azz note about how they “couldn’t” refund because “incurred expenses” (nothing was incurred for rec btw as coaches are parents working for free and fields allocation can be reimbursed) but somehow managed to get over $500,000 from the federal government precisely to offset those alleged covid losses?
Lmao please stfu. Your constant trying of bashing FCV with no tangible arguments other than they’re niche club and other mediocre reasoning is just pathetic.
Loudoun soccer has a track record of operating close to illegality. Let alone morally or ethically.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Hint: it’s related to that heist pulled off in Spring of 2020
FCV didn't give out refunds either.
Anonymous wrote:Assuming things look roughly the same in rankings next year this is how FCV GA teams will look like:
05 - 3rd
06 - 2nd
07 - 2nd
08 - 4th
09 - 13th
10 - 15th
11 - Pre GA Unranked in both Youth Soccer Rankings AND GotSoccer. Is there even a 11 team. I can't find any record of them playing in NCSL, EDP or ODSL
Anonymous wrote:
FCV is a niche girls club and relies on recruiting players to their teams to survive, which requires winning teams and a track record of college placements for marketing.
Anonymous wrote:
Hint: it’s related to that heist pulled off in Spring of 2020
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The main issue LS has is that if FCV were awarded an ECNL spot Loudoun Club would cease to exist. The numbers in college and national team placement do not lie.
I know I can speak on the subject with kids in both programs. (Loudoun child stays because of friends - FCV child does not leave due to high soccer aspirations in the future)
Loudoun would still have over 10000 kids signing up every year.
You sure? There’s a reason They cut coaching salaries by 30%.
Hint: it’s related to that heist pulled off in Spring of 2020
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ECNL mid Atlantic conf has many poor teams. Why is this being ignored?
The NC and SC teams are not very good with maybe one exception. Too many teams and the talent is watered down.
Let's not talk about a few of the more local teams. ouch
You don't have a clue. Let's look at overall stats of both 07 conferences:
Teams in top 100: ECNL MA: 36% (5 teams); GA MA: 10% (1 team)
Teams in top 125: ECNL MA: 50% (7 teams); GA MA: 20% (2 teams)
Teams in top 200: ECNL MA: 72% (10 teams); GA MA: 50% (5 teams)
Teams OUTSIDE TOP 300 ECNL MA: 14% (2 teams); GA MA: 40% (4 teams).....one of which FVC tied 4-4......
NC/SC in the 07 MA ECNL have 6 teams in top 150 and only 1 outside top 300 (NCFC). Safe to say that outside of NCFC and BRYC, ECNL MA is very strong and teams are getting really good competition week in and week out.
Youth Soccer Rankings of teams in both conferences (ECNL teams in bold):
VA Union 25
FCV 37
Charlotte SA 82
NC Courage 83
Loudoun 86
Charlotte Indep 90
Wilmington 102
CESA 112
Balt Armour 114
Balt Celt 134
NC Fusion 137
Phil Ukran 153
Arlington 190
SJEB 190
Richmond 199
Cedar Stars 224
VDA 247
SC 292
PA Classics 317
NCFC 392
Skyline 427
Metro 479
Sporting DE 598
BRYC 627
Go back to being a CCL dad
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ECNL mid Atlantic conf has many poor teams. Why is this being ignored?
The NC and SC teams are not very good with maybe one exception. Too many teams and the talent is watered down.
Let's not talk about a few of the more local teams. ouch
You don't have a clue. Let's look at overall stats of both 07 conferences:
Teams in top 100: ECNL MA: 36% (5 teams); GA MA: 10% (1 team)
Teams in top 125: ECNL MA: 50% (7 teams); GA MA: 20% (2 teams)
Teams in top 200: ECNL MA: 72% (10 teams); GA MA: 50% (5 teams)
Teams OUTSIDE TOP 300 ECNL MA: 14% (2 teams); GA MA: 40% (4 teams).....one of which FVC tied 4-4......
NC/SC in the 07 MA ECNL have 6 teams in top 150 and only 1 outside top 300 (NCFC). Safe to say that outside of NCFC and BRYC, ECNL MA is very strong and teams are getting really good competition week in and week out.
Youth Soccer Rankings of teams in both conferences (ECNL teams in bold):
VA Union 25
FCV 37
Charlotte SA 82
NC Courage 83
Loudoun 86
Charlotte Indep 90
Wilmington 102
CESA 112
Balt Armour 114
Balt Celt 134
NC Fusion 137
Phil Ukran 153
Arlington 190
SJEB 190
Richmond 199
Cedar Stars 224
VDA 247
SC 292
PA Classics 317
NCFC 392
Skyline 427
Metro 479
Sporting DE 598
BRYC 627
Go back to being a CCL dad
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ECNL mid Atlantic conf has many poor teams. Why is this being ignored?
The NC and SC teams are not very good with maybe one exception. Too many teams and the talent is watered down.
Let's not talk about a few of the more local teams. ouch
You don't have a clue. Let's look at overall stats of both 07 conferences:
Teams in top 100: ECNL MA: 36% (5 teams); GA MA: 10% (1 team)
Teams in top 125: ECNL MA: 50% (7 teams); GA MA: 20% (2 teams)
Teams in top 200: ECNL MA: 72% (10 teams); GA MA: 50% (5 teams)
Teams OUTSIDE TOP 300 ECNL MA: 14% (2 teams); GA MA: 40% (4 teams).....one of which FVC tied 4-4......
NC/SC in the 07 MA ECNL have 6 teams in top 150 and only 1 outside top 300 (NCFC). Safe to say that outside of NCFC and BRYC, ECNL MA is very strong and teams are getting really good competition week in and week out.
Youth Soccer Rankings of teams in both conferences (ECNL teams in bold):
VA Union 25
FCV 37
Charlotte SA 82
NC Courage 83
Loudoun 86
Charlotte Indep 90
Wilmington 102
CESA 112
Balt Armour 114
Balt Celt 134
NC Fusion 137
Phil Ukran 153
Arlington 190
SJEB 190
Richmond 199
Cedar Stars 224
VDA 247
SC 292
PA Classics 317
NCFC 392
Skyline 427
Metro 479
Sporting DE 598
BRYC 627
Anonymous wrote:The ECNL mid Atlantic conf has many poor teams. Why is this being ignored?
The NC and SC teams are not very good with maybe one exception. Too many teams and the talent is watered down.
Let's not talk about a few of the more local teams. ouch
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ECNL mid Atlantic conf has many poor teams. Why is this being ignored?
The NC and SC teams are not very good with maybe one exception. Too many teams and the talent is watered down.
Let's not talk about a few of the more local teams. ouch
There is not one conference opponent FCV faces that is ranked in the top 100 nationally and they are still 2-1-1 and in 3rd place currently in GA.
Yet your best ECNL team only beat them in overtime by a defensive mistake a handful of minutes shy of penalty shootout… methinks your ECNL program isn’t that big of a deal either?
And a last second FG helped my Ravens beat the Lions this last weekend. Do you really think those two teams are about even?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ECNL mid Atlantic conf has many poor teams. Why is this being ignored?
The NC and SC teams are not very good with maybe one exception. Too many teams and the talent is watered down.
Let's not talk about a few of the more local teams. ouch
There is not one conference opponent FCV faces that is ranked in the top 100 nationally and they are still 2-1-1 and in 3rd place currently in GA.
Yet your best ECNL team only beat them in overtime by a defensive mistake a handful of minutes shy of penalty shootout… methinks your ECNL program isn’t that big of a deal either?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ECNL mid Atlantic conf has many poor teams. Why is this being ignored?
The NC and SC teams are not very good with maybe one exception. Too many teams and the talent is watered down.
Let's not talk about a few of the more local teams. ouch
There is not one conference opponent FCV faces that is ranked in the top 100 nationally and they are still 2-1-1 and in 3rd place currently in GA.
Yet your best ECNL team only beat them in overtime by a defensive mistake a handful of minutes shy of penalty shootout… methinks your ECNL program isn’t that big of a deal either?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ECNL mid Atlantic conf has many poor teams. Why is this being ignored?
The NC and SC teams are not very good with maybe one exception. Too many teams and the talent is watered down.
Let's not talk about a few of the more local teams. ouch
There is not one conference opponent FCV faces that is ranked in the top 100 nationally and they are still 2-1-1 and in 3rd place currently in GA.