Reply to Be mindful of what you post — Employer could be watching

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Be mindful of what you post — Employer could be watching "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]These people deserve to lose their jobs.  Totally unacceptable.

[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G00-9N7WQAAoIPM?format=jpg&name=medium[/img]

[twitter]https://x.com/CatfishBilly33/status/1967256118838935710[/twitter][/quote]

I just appreciate the irony that the whole "F" your feelings crowd who gleefully celebrated Biden's failing health, Paul Pelosi getting beaten with a hammer, ignored their breathern who stampeded Congress with a noose and gallows, pretended like one of their own didn't cosplay as a cop and murder a couple of local politicians, and whose mindset something like 70-65% of mass shooters follows (whose very acts they claim are fabricated by the "deep state") are getting all bent out of shape because some Goebbels wanna be got shot by own of their own.

Hypocrites.[/quote]

1.  Republicans didn't celebrate Biden's failing health.  We called it out in an effort to convince the Democrats and the media to see what was right in front of your faces. 
2.  Tell us about the Republicans who celebrated the Paul Pelosi attack.  Name them. 
3.  The whole J6 riot was roundly condemned by Republicans.  
4.  The murderer of the MN politicians [b]once worked for Tim Walz and claimed that Tim Walz told him to kill the lawmakers[/b].  How is this someone from the right?

And, your referring to Kirk as a "Goebbels wanna be" is outright disgusting, offensive, and nothing can be further from the truth.

One last thing.... you appear to have major anger issues.  Get help.  [/quote]

BTW, Goebbels was the propogandist for Hitler. Seems to have also been Kirk's role for Trump where young people are the audience.

1. Republicans were delighted by indications of Bidens poor health. They ridiculed him and figured it made the election a slam dunk. Trump was extremely angry when he withdrew. 
2. I saw a comment in a local newspaper just this week about how Paul Pelosi was "alert and coherent" just after his "boyfriend" clocked him on the head. So I guess they still think it was funny. 
3. The riot was roundly condemned for about 5 minutes. Ok, exaggeration. A few days to a few weeks before the backpedalling began. If they condemned it, why did they turn on Cheney and Kitzinger for their participation in the committee? Why, during the impeachment trial, did they not just vote to condemn the action even if they didn't want to find Trump guilty? Why have they not objected strenuously (even though Trump has the privilege) to the pardons? 
4. The Minnesota guy did not "work for" Walz. He applied and was accepted to an advisory council of some 46 members of the public to look at workforce development. Such councils are sprinkled throughout state governments. Participants have no power to decide or execute policy. They listen to reports and presentations at quarterly meetings. You do not get asked your political affiliation on these; I was nominated by a republican governor to such a council in the early 2000s and I have never voted Republican in my life.

It sounds like on some level you do want to believe the republican party is populated by decent, responsible people. Obviously you wouldn't post comments like the one about Paul Pelosi I just mentioned. But it's been overrun by the worst kind of people.   [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics