Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Pitt Jolie FINALLY reach divorce settlement "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] She believes she is entitled to have the lawsuit against her dropped and tries to make a business dispute personal. [/quote] Why do you keep repeating this when BRAD was the one to make the business deal personal? That's exactly why the judge gave her ALL of her discovery requests over his correspondences. [/quote] Jolie is the one who made the wine dispute personal. She has used the case to attempt to re-litigate her abuse allegations for the millionth time. The only relevant legal question is whether they had a contract not to sell their shares without the other’s approval and whether Jolie breached the contract.[/quote] Was Angelina the one who mentioned the abuse and left their deal only to try and change the terms? That was BRAD. They have to decide if he was negotiating in good faith or not. The judge already made her decision that the abuse and his communications are relevant based on HIS actions. [/quote] We have no idea what he asked in the NDA. Seems NDA’s are done a lot especially with those two.[/quote] The NDA was a standard NDA that stated that no one involved with the sale would publicly disparage each other or the property. Angelina supposedly claimed this boilerplate NDA was unconscionable in order to get out of the sale, because she wanted to sell to Stoli for more money and to hurt Brad. [/quote] He changed the NDA terms after leaving the deal and cited leaving because she filed the papers about abuse. Why didn't he change it back?[/quote] Because he didn’t want to pay her $55 million for the winery only to have her publicly disparage him and hurt the value of his investment. That’s only logical. The Miraval brand relied on his name and reputation. Why couldn’t Jolie accept a standard NDA that she has signed many times before and also asked others to sign? I bet her deal with Stoli has a similar clause in the contract. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics