Reply to Middle Schools for Cap Hill

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Middle Schools for Cap Hill"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]FWIW, here are the percentages of white students at Jefferson, Stuart-Hobson, Eliot-Hine and Deal who met or exceeded expectations on the latest PARCC:

Jefferson: 100% ELA, 90.9% math

Stuart-Hobson: 92.7% ELA, 72.2% math

Eliot-Hine: 85.7% ELA, 85.7% math

Deal: 94.6% ELA, 80.8% math

BS- there aren’t enough white students at Jefferson taking PAARC to pull race based test scores.   There aren’t more than 10white kids in any grade at Jefferson. Look at the overall test scores at Jefferson.

[/quote][/quote]

In order to report the [i]overall[/i] data on white students for an entire school, there need only be at least 10 white students in the entire school. And the last time PARCC scores were released, the data showed that 100% of the white kids at Jefferson met or exceeded expectations in ELA, and 90.9% met or exceeded expectations in math.

You can look it up yourself in the link below if you still don't believe me.

https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fdcps.dc.gov%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fdc%2Fsites%2Fdcps%2Fpublication%2Fattachments%2F2019-Overall-and-Subgroups_public_formatted.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

[/quote]

I am the PPP who called BS on the idea that white scores on CH were lower than in other areas of DC. I didn't bother to post the data because there is no point. You are wasting your time pointing out the &gt;10 reporting logic because the people to whom you are replying are similar in nature to Trump acolytes; they believe something and it has been reinforced so many times that no amount of data or logic can penetrate their beliefs.

The structure of these interactions is basically the same every time.

1. Allege a set of facts that are not true to support a conclusion.
2. When faced with the actual data that shows their &quot;facts&quot; were incorrect, make unfounded and incorrect claims about the veracity or methodology of the data.
3. When faced with the reality of how that data is collected and reported, come back over the top and claim that the data (that they introduced into the discussion) doesn't matter. Then just restate the original unsupported conclusion as proof that the data doesn't mean anything.

These people are not worth your time.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics