Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK, so why isn't Jefferson a lot more popular with UMC in-boundary families and families with children in the several feeder elementary schools? Mainly a question of poor public relations?
At a Jefferson open house I attended this spring, admins were more than a little cagey about what sort of "honors classes" were offered and how students tested into these classes. I couldn't get a straight answer out of them, couldn't make sense of how the placement system worked. By contrast, at Stuart Hobson, I was told exactly how students were evaluated for/admitted to honors English and math classes. I was also told that there weren't any honors science or social studies classes, or any planned.
Brent parents considering Jefferson Academy have complained about this issue repeatedly on DCUM in the last several years. Brent parents who send their children to JA invariably respond with assurances that appropriate rigor is ensured across the board, never mind what the test-in-to-honors-classes-system might be (if there is indeed a system). Needless to say, UMC buy-in at JA from Brent, Tyler and Van Ness remains low and has a desperate feel (as in, we're all for JA, never mind the fact that we were shut out of BASIS and Latin, lack access to Hobson, and can't handle the commute to DCI).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK, so why isn't Jefferson a lot more popular with UMC in-boundary families and families with children in the several feeder elementary schools? Mainly a question of poor public relations?
At a Jefferson open house I attended this spring, admins were more than a little cagey about what sort of "honors classes" were offered and how students tested into these classes. I couldn't get a straight answer out of them, couldn't make sense of how the placement system worked. By contrast, at Stuart Hobson, I was told exactly how students were evaluated for/admitted to honors English and math classes. I was also told that there weren't any honors science or social studies classes, or any planned.
You answered your own question, because there are charters that actually have honors classes and have better cohorts
This isn't hard folks everyone is trying to trade up to get into the best slot for their kids period.
That's questionable. Latin doesn't have "honors" classes. Neither does BASIS. Both may have high expectations but they don't track. BASIS will allow advanced math placements and provide AP opportunities, sometimes way earlier than advisable. Latin has resisted math tracking for years until finally relenting.
And Stuart Hobson "honors" ELA has been more 'honors for all' during the pandemic. Will remain to see how it's handled moving forward. There's more math tracking available.[/qu
ote]
An "honors" class is only as advanced as the actual students sitting in it. Remember Wilson now has "honors for all" so its meaningless. If the majority of kids are BELOW grade level then any kid at grade level would be considered honors. Not much of a draw. Jefferson PARC scores-only 21 % met or exceeded expections. A significant percent, 50% scored 2 or less. thats not even approaching grade level! So what kind of honors classes are we talking about? The schools priority is not to serve academica high acheivers. It will change but I would assume at least 10 years.
Anonymous wrote:top of class at Eastern is a cake walk but sure pay 20,000+ a year and pray that you are in the top 10% among legit applicants.... idiots
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FWIW, here are the percentages of white students at Jefferson, Stuart-Hobson, Eliot-Hine and Deal who met or exceeded expectations on the latest PARCC:
Jefferson: 100% ELA, 90.9% math
Stuart-Hobson: 92.7% ELA, 72.2% math
Eliot-Hine: 85.7% ELA, 85.7% math
Deal: 94.6% ELA, 80.8% math
Please, sample sizes aren't large enough for Eliot-Hine, Jefferson or Stuart Hobson to tell us much, other than that a small number of high SES/white families are now using these schools. There are, what, two dozen white students at both EH and Jefferson, and no more than 60 at SH. Contrast those numbers to 650-700 white students at Deal.
I also think the families willing to roll the dice on EH and Jefferson are likely families with kids who “will do well anywhere.”
that's why this whole conversation is pointless high SES people will do well anywhere. And hint going to Eastern and being at the top of the class is a better chance at top schools than going to any private or moving to the burbs.... mind blown.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FWIW, here are the percentages of white students at Jefferson, Stuart-Hobson, Eliot-Hine and Deal who met or exceeded expectations on the latest PARCC:
Jefferson: 100% ELA, 90.9% math
Stuart-Hobson: 92.7% ELA, 72.2% math
Eliot-Hine: 85.7% ELA, 85.7% math
Deal: 94.6% ELA, 80.8% math
Please, sample sizes aren't large enough for Eliot-Hine, Jefferson or Stuart Hobson to tell us much, other than that a small number of high SES/white families are now using these schools. There are, what, two dozen white students at both EH and Jefferson, and no more than 60 at SH. Contrast those numbers to 650-700 white students at Deal.
I also think the families willing to roll the dice on EH and Jefferson are likely families with kids who “will do well anywhere.”
that's why this whole conversation is pointless high SES people will do well anywhere. And hint going to Eastern and being at the top of the class is a better chance at top schools than going to any private or moving to the burbs.... mind blown.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FWIW, here are the percentages of white students at Jefferson, Stuart-Hobson, Eliot-Hine and Deal who met or exceeded expectations on the latest PARCC:
Jefferson: 100% ELA, 90.9% math
Stuart-Hobson: 92.7% ELA, 72.2% math
Eliot-Hine: 85.7% ELA, 85.7% math
Deal: 94.6% ELA, 80.8% math
Please, sample sizes aren't large enough for Eliot-Hine, Jefferson or Stuart Hobson to tell us much, other than that a small number of high SES/white families are now using these schools. There are, what, two dozen white students at both EH and Jefferson, and no more than 60 at SH. Contrast those numbers to 650-700 white students at Deal.
I also think the families willing to roll the dice on EH and Jefferson are likely families with kids who “will do well anywhere.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School demographic change always lags neighborhood change. I think Jefferson might be interesting over the next 5-10 years. The Wharf only opened 4 years ago this fall. While the old Brent neighbors might have been different, Brent is probably at this stage too wealthy and "gentrified" to become a serious feeder. But I could potentially see kids from the other 3 schools starting to attend in reasonably large numbers.
The fallacy that demographics alone can create a good school is often heard on Hill playgrounds. It takes that, plus buy-in from administration to offer honors classes and hire teachers capable of teaching them. Demographics alone can take a school further in ES than in MS and HS, and parents need to remember this. You may have “flipped” your local ES by encouraging your neighbors to enroll but it is not so simple as the kids get older. That said, I truly believe that this attitude is also the reason that the performance of white ES students on the hill on standardized tests lags behind the same demographic in other school districts.
Ummmm, that's not actually accurate. And even less so when you adjust for socio-economic factors. But by all means just keep typing whatever comes into your head.
The reality is that families in the city supplement like crazy and those in the burbs who have access to tracking not so much if any.
Not remotely responsive. PPP typed that white PARCC scores on CH lagged behind other DC schools and used that data point to support their point. I responded that the score data point is in fact not true. White UMC scores in DC are pretty consistent across the board. And you replied to say something about "supplementing"?
With apologies to John Mulaney, ""OK. Let's talk about his entirely different thing."
No PP says it lags behind other high performing school districts such in Nova or MD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FWIW, here are the percentages of white students at Jefferson, Stuart-Hobson, Eliot-Hine and Deal who met or exceeded expectations on the latest PARCC:
Jefferson: 100% ELA, 90.9% math
Stuart-Hobson: 92.7% ELA, 72.2% math
Eliot-Hine: 85.7% ELA, 85.7% math
Deal: 94.6% ELA, 80.8% math
Please, sample sizes aren't large enough for Eliot-Hine, Jefferson or Stuart Hobson to tell us much, other than that a small number of high SES/white families are now using these schools. There are, what, two dozen white students at both EH and Jefferson, and no more than 60 at SH. Contrast those numbers to 650-700 white students at Deal.
I also think the families willing to roll the dice on EH and Jefferson are likely families with kids who “will do well anywhere.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FWIW, here are the percentages of white students at Jefferson, Stuart-Hobson, Eliot-Hine and Deal who met or exceeded expectations on the latest PARCC:
Jefferson: 100% ELA, 90.9% math
Stuart-Hobson: 92.7% ELA, 72.2% math
Eliot-Hine: 85.7% ELA, 85.7% math
Deal: 94.6% ELA, 80.8% math
BS- there aren’t enough white students at Jefferson taking PAARC to pull race based test scores. There aren’t more than 10white kids in any grade at Jefferson. Look at the overall test scores at Jefferson.
In order to report the overall data on white students for an entire school, there need only be at least 10 white students in the entire school. And the last time PARCC scores were released, the data showed that 100% of the white kids at Jefferson met or exceeded expectations in ELA, and 90.9% met or exceeded expectations in math.
You can look it up yourself in the link below if you still don't believe me.
https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fdcps.dc.gov%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fdc%2Fsites%2Fdcps%2Fpublication%2Fattachments%2F2019-Overall-and-Subgroups_public_formatted.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School demographic change always lags neighborhood change. I think Jefferson might be interesting over the next 5-10 years. The Wharf only opened 4 years ago this fall. While the old Brent neighbors might have been different, Brent is probably at this stage too wealthy and "gentrified" to become a serious feeder. But I could potentially see kids from the other 3 schools starting to attend in reasonably large numbers.
The fallacy that demographics alone can create a good school is often heard on Hill playgrounds. It takes that, plus buy-in from administration to offer honors classes and hire teachers capable of teaching them. Demographics alone can take a school further in ES than in MS and HS, and parents need to remember this. You may have “flipped” your local ES by encouraging your neighbors to enroll but it is not so simple as the kids get older. That said, I truly believe that this attitude is also the reason that the performance of white ES students on the hill on standardized tests lags behind the same demographic in other school districts.
Ummmm, that's not actually accurate. And even less so when you adjust for socio-economic factors. But by all means just keep typing whatever comes into your head.