Reply to Boycott Virginia - new abortion law, new personhood law..... War on woman

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Boycott Virginia - new abortion law, new personhood law..... War on woman"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]nowhere in the law does it say anything about "vaginal probes".  stop being dramatic.  ultrasounds can of course be done over the belly.  not as accurate as the vaginal type for early pregnancies I guess, but accuracy really isn't the need here right?  so shut up about the "medical rape" shit.[/quote]

I think the purpose of the law is for the woman to see the beating heart.  She won't be able to see it without the probe.   Without her seeing  the heartbeat, the law is just pointless.[/quote]

Depending on the early stage of pregnancy, a vaginal ultrasound may absolutely be necessary to detect the heartbeat.  As someone who is overweight, not grossly so but still, a vaginal ultrasound was absolutely necessary to see my child at 10 wks.

This is only about forcing a woman to see a heartbeat and the shape of the fetus.  Even if the ultrasound is necessary to perform the procedure, there is no reason a women should be forced to view the screen and hear the heartbeat.  Turn the screen away and mute the sound, period.  Of course the expectation is that she would feel so horrible that she would change her mind.   Or she would have to live with the horrible image the remainder of her life.  It blows my mind that anyone would consider this an [i]easy [/i]decision.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics