Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night? [/quote] Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient. She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.[/quote] MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there. [/quote] Facts? Truth? How about presumption of innocence? Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims. Zilch. She had no facts. And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth. Not THE truth. [/quote] We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down. Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth? [/quote] Oh, FFS. I am not going to relitigate this whole issue........ Suffice it to make a few point..... 1. Kavanaugh went through 7 FBI background investigations. These are quite thorough. Not one accusation such as the one Blasey Ford threw at him came up. All the women who had worked with him and clerked for him only had praises and glowing statements. 2. Daggers out? Nobody has "daggers out." We are just sick of the FALSE - yes - FALSE accusations thrown at him. Like him chasing women around the desk. You people are insufferable. [/quote] 1. LOL that you think they are “thorough” or would cover an incident like this. Did FoxNews tell you that? Gullible fool. 2. “appears to be early onset dementia patient” = lame attempt to tear her down I wouldn’t want my DD on his basketball team. [/quote] Well, good thing your DD won't be playing on his basketball team. And, how do I know about FBI background checks? My spouse has been through 3. They are thorough. They also check on alcohol consumption - something liberals have repeated over and over - with no evidence whatsoever - that is a problem for Kavanaugh. Face it - the liberals were going to go to any length to derail his nomination. Your efforts almost paid off. Glad Trump stood strong. [/quote] Please explain exactly how a background check would have uncovered this incident. Since you claim to be familiar. LOL. [/quote] Background checks pry into the behavioral history of applicants by asking friends, colleagues, neighbors and relatives questions about drug use, alcohol use, relationships, spending habits, and a whole host of other topics. They most certainly interviewed his friends - likely some from HS - colleagues, and neighbors about these topics. And, as we all know, it is illegal to lie to the FBI about details. If the type of behavior of which he was accused had happened, it would have come up. [/quote] Lol. They interview the people [i]whose names you have supplied.[/i] It’s not like a Law and Order police investigation where they exhaustively hunt down every thread of your life. Do you think Squi was going to squeal? And then the White House squashed the actual investigation by the FBI by preventing them from actually investigating. So no, seven background investigations wouldn’t have revealed anything. Heck, we still don’t know how he paid for that enormous house or who paid off his massive (gambling?) debt. - married to a federal background investigator [/quote] +1 Why would someone give the names of people who they’ve assaulted? And people lie all of the time. I have been “debriefed” a few times to sort out some details for background checks. A background check isn’t the same as an investigation into a specific incident. Why are MAGAs so afraid of a real investigation? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics