Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

And the facts/truth are what, exactly? Do tell.

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Were you? Was anybody? In this country, we don't slap a guilty label on someone who has flatly denied a crime, and whose accuser has absolutely no evidence or corroborating witnesses. Doesn't work that way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think everything about kavanagh is true. He was a blackout drunk in HS who did assault girls. I also think it’s true he is an upstanding husband and devoted father. His friends who know him now and defend him as they know him are also right. This is what’s hard for people to get, even the best guy is capable of horrible behavior in certain situations.

I do not think he is an upstanding husband. I think it’s footage of his nomination in which she flinches at his touch. We all saw his anger.

What do you want --a robot?

His wife likely likes him just fine.

How would you feel if you were falsely accused? If your spouse were falsely accused?

Anonymous wrote:I think everything about kavanagh is true. He was a blackout drunk in HS who did assault girls. I also think it’s true he is an upstanding husband and devoted father. His friends who know him now and defend him as they know him are also right. This is what’s hard for people to get, even the best guy is capable of horrible behavior in certain situations.

I do not think he is an upstanding husband. I think it’s footage of his nomination in which she flinches at his touch. We all saw his anger.

I think everything about kavanagh is true. He was a blackout drunk in HS who did assault girls. I also think it’s true he is an upstanding husband and devoted father. His friends who know him now and defend him as they know him are also right. This is what’s hard for people to get, even the best guy is capable of horrible behavior in certain situations.

Anonymous wrote:Tiger Mom knows that at the end of day, Supreme Court clerkship is a Supreme Court clerkship. Signing bonus. White mommies gnash teeth in anger. Tiger Mom plays long game.

A signing bonus with the Army? Or have we dropped the pretense she will serve.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

Facts? Truth?
How about presumption of innocence? Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims. Zilch.
She had no facts. And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth. Not THE truth.

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?

Oh, FFS.
I am not going to relitigate this whole issue........
Suffice it to make a few point.....
1. Kavanaugh went through 7 FBI background investigations. These are quite thorough. Not one accusation such as the one Blasey Ford threw at him came up. All the women who had worked with him and clerked for him only had praises and glowing statements.
2. Daggers out? Nobody has "daggers out." We are just sick of the FALSE - yes - FALSE accusations thrown at him. Like him chasing women around the desk. You people are insufferable.

1. LOL that you think they are “thorough” or would cover an incident like this. Did FoxNews tell you that? Gullible fool.

2. “appears to be early onset dementia patient” = lame attempt to tear her down

I wouldn’t want my DD on his basketball team.

Well, good thing your DD won't be playing on his basketball team.
And, how do I know about FBI background checks? My spouse has been through 3. They are thorough.
They also check on alcohol consumption - something liberals have repeated over and over - with no evidence whatsoever - that is a problem for Kavanaugh.
Face it - the liberals were going to go to any length to derail his nomination. Your efforts almost paid off. Glad Trump stood strong.

Please explain exactly how a background check would have uncovered this incident. Since you claim to be familiar. LOL.

Background checks pry into the behavioral history of applicants by asking friends, colleagues, neighbors and relatives questions about drug use, alcohol use, relationships, spending habits, and a whole host of other topics. They most certainly interviewed his friends - likely some from HS - colleagues, and neighbors about these topics. And, as we all know, it is illegal to lie to the FBI about details.
If the type of behavior of which he was accused had happened, it would have come up.

Lol. They interview the people whose names you have supplied. It’s not like a Law and Order police investigation where they exhaustively hunt down every thread of your life. Do you think Squi was going to squeal? And then the White House squashed the actual investigation by the FBI by preventing them from actually investigating. So no, seven background investigations wouldn’t have revealed anything. Heck, we still don’t know how he paid for that enormous house or who paid off his massive (gambling?) debt.
- married to a federal background investigator

+1

Why would someone give the names of people who they’ve assaulted?

And people lie all of the time. I have been “debriefed” a few times to sort out some details for background checks.

A background check isn’t the same as an investigation into a specific incident. Why are MAGAs so afraid of a real investigation?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

Facts? Truth?
How about presumption of innocence? Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims. Zilch.
She had no facts. And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth. Not THE truth.

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?

Oh, FFS.
I am not going to relitigate this whole issue........
Suffice it to make a few point.....
1. Kavanaugh went through 7 FBI background investigations. These are quite thorough. Not one accusation such as the one Blasey Ford threw at him came up. All the women who had worked with him and clerked for him only had praises and glowing statements.
2. Daggers out? Nobody has "daggers out." We are just sick of the FALSE - yes - FALSE accusations thrown at him. Like him chasing women around the desk. You people are insufferable.

1. LOL that you think they are “thorough” or would cover an incident like this. Did FoxNews tell you that? Gullible fool.

2. “appears to be early onset dementia patient” = lame attempt to tear her down

I wouldn’t want my DD on his basketball team.

Well, good thing your DD won't be playing on his basketball team.
And, how do I know about FBI background checks? My spouse has been through 3. They are thorough.
They also check on alcohol consumption - something liberals have repeated over and over - with no evidence whatsoever - that is a problem for Kavanaugh.
Face it - the liberals were going to go to any length to derail his nomination. Your efforts almost paid off. Glad Trump stood strong.

Please explain exactly how a background check would have uncovered this incident. Since you claim to be familiar. LOL.

Background checks pry into the behavioral history of applicants by asking friends, colleagues, neighbors and relatives questions about drug use, alcohol use, relationships, spending habits, and a whole host of other topics. They most certainly interviewed his friends - likely some from HS - colleagues, and neighbors about these topics. And, as we all know, it is illegal to lie to the FBI about details.
If the type of behavior of which he was accused had happened, it would have come up.

Lol. They interview the people whose names you have supplied. It’s not like a Law and Order police investigation where they exhaustively hunt down every thread of your life. Do you think Squi was going to squeal? And then the White House squashed the actual investigation by the FBI by preventing them from actually investigating. So no, seven background investigations wouldn’t have revealed anything. Heck, we still don’t know how he paid for that enormous house or who paid off his massive (gambling?) debt.
- married to a federal background investigator

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

Facts? Truth?
How about presumption of innocence? Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims. Zilch.
She had no facts. And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth. Not THE truth.

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?

Oh, FFS.
I am not going to relitigate this whole issue........
Suffice it to make a few point.....
1. Kavanaugh went through 7 FBI background investigations. These are quite thorough. Not one accusation such as the one Blasey Ford threw at him came up. All the women who had worked with him and clerked for him only had praises and glowing statements.
2. Daggers out? Nobody has "daggers out." We are just sick of the FALSE - yes - FALSE accusations thrown at him. Like him chasing women around the desk. You people are insufferable.

1. LOL that you think they are “thorough” or would cover an incident like this. Did FoxNews tell you that? Gullible fool.

2. “appears to be early onset dementia patient” = lame attempt to tear her down

I wouldn’t want my DD on his basketball team.

Well, good thing your DD won't be playing on his basketball team.
And, how do I know about FBI background checks? My spouse has been through 3. They are thorough.
They also check on alcohol consumption - something liberals have repeated over and over - with no evidence whatsoever - that is a problem for Kavanaugh.
Face it - the liberals were going to go to any length to derail his nomination. Your efforts almost paid off. Glad Trump stood strong.

Please explain exactly how a background check would have uncovered this incident. Since you claim to be familiar. LOL.

Background checks pry into the behavioral history of applicants by asking friends, colleagues, neighbors and relatives questions about drug use, alcohol use, relationships, spending habits, and a whole host of other topics. They most certainly interviewed his friends - likely some from HS - colleagues, and neighbors about these topics. And, as we all know, it is illegal to lie to the FBI about details.
If the type of behavior of which he was accused had happened, it would have come up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

Facts? Truth?
How about presumption of innocence? Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims. Zilch.
She had no facts. And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth. Not THE truth.

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?

Oh, FFS.
I am not going to relitigate this whole issue........
Suffice it to make a few point.....
1. Kavanaugh went through 7 FBI background investigations. These are quite thorough. Not one accusation such as the one Blasey Ford threw at him came up. All the women who had worked with him and clerked for him only had praises and glowing statements.
2. Daggers out? Nobody has "daggers out." We are just sick of the FALSE - yes - FALSE accusations thrown at him. Like him chasing women around the desk. You people are insufferable.

1. LOL that you think they are “thorough” or would cover an incident like this. Did FoxNews tell you that? Gullible fool.

2. “appears to be early onset dementia patient” = lame attempt to tear her down

I wouldn’t want my DD on his basketball team.

Well, good thing your DD won't be playing on his basketball team.
And, how do I know about FBI background checks? My spouse has been through 3. They are thorough.
They also check on alcohol consumption - something liberals have repeated over and over - with no evidence whatsoever - that is a problem for Kavanaugh.
Face it - the liberals were going to go to any length to derail his nomination. Your efforts almost paid off. Glad Trump stood strong.

Please explain exactly how a background check would have uncovered this incident. Since you claim to be familiar. LOL.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

Facts? Truth?
How about presumption of innocence? Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims. Zilch.
She had no facts. And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth. Not THE truth.

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?

Oh, FFS.
I am not going to relitigate this whole issue........
Suffice it to make a few point.....
1. Kavanaugh went through 7 FBI background investigations. These are quite thorough. Not one accusation such as the one Blasey Ford threw at him came up. All the women who had worked with him and clerked for him only had praises and glowing statements.
2. Daggers out? Nobody has "daggers out." We are just sick of the FALSE - yes - FALSE accusations thrown at him. Like him chasing women around the desk. You people are insufferable.

1. LOL that you think they are “thorough” or would cover an incident like this. Did FoxNews tell you that? Gullible fool.

2. “appears to be early onset dementia patient” = lame attempt to tear her down

I wouldn’t want my DD on his basketball team.

Well, good thing your DD won't be playing on his basketball team.
And, how do I know about FBI background checks? My spouse has been through 3. They are thorough.
They also check on alcohol consumption - something liberals have repeated over and over - with no evidence whatsoever - that is a problem for Kavanaugh.
Face it - the liberals were going to go to any length to derail his nomination. Your efforts almost paid off. Glad Trump stood strong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

Facts? Truth?
How about presumption of innocence? Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims. Zilch.
She had no facts. And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth. Not THE truth.

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?

Oh, FFS.
I am not going to relitigate this whole issue........
Suffice it to make a few point.....
1. Kavanaugh went through 7 FBI background investigations. These are quite thorough. Not one accusation such as the one Blasey Ford threw at him came up. All the women who had worked with him and clerked for him only had praises and glowing statements.
2. Daggers out? Nobody has "daggers out." We are just sick of the FALSE - yes - FALSE accusations thrown at him. Like him chasing women around the desk. You people are insufferable.

1. LOL that you think they are “thorough” or would cover an incident like this. Did FoxNews tell you that? Gullible fool.

2. “appears to be early onset dementia patient” = lame attempt to tear her down

I wouldn’t want my DD on his basketball team.

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?



Oh, FFS.
I am not going to relitigate this whole issue........
Suffice it to make a few point.....
1. Kavanaugh went through 7 FBI background investigations. These are quite thorough. Not one accusation such as the one Blasey Ford threw at him came up. All the women who had worked with him and clerked for him only had praises and glowing statements.
2. Daggers out? Nobody has "daggers out." We are just sick of the FALSE - yes - FALSE accusations thrown at him. Like him chasing women around the desk. You people are insufferable.

+1

Also, to first PP, please explain just one of Ford's claims--that she only talked about testifying with her "beach friends." Makes one wonder, when it turns out that her "beach friend" was her former roommate (you know, the one she helped with the polygraph test before she became an FBI agent?) Oh yes, this FBI agent also worked for Preet Bahara in SDNY--a vocal Trump critic.
And, then, there was this: please explain why she couldn't come earlier because she was afraid of flying--and yet, she had just flown to the East Coast the month before and was in the DMV area at that time.

There are many other things we can tear apart about her testimony--but, that is likely found in a very, very long thread about Kavanaugh.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

Facts? Truth?
How about presumption of innocence? Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims. Zilch.
She had no facts. And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth. Not THE truth.

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?

Oh, FFS.
I am not going to relitigate this whole issue........
Suffice it to make a few point.....
1. Kavanaugh went through 7 FBI background investigations. These are quite thorough. Not one accusation such as the one Blasey Ford threw at him came up. All the women who had worked with him and clerked for him only had praises and glowing statements.
2. Daggers out? Nobody has "daggers out." We are just sick of the FALSE - yes - FALSE accusations thrown at him. Like him chasing women around the desk. You people are insufferable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

Facts? Truth?
How about presumption of innocence? Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims. Zilch.
She had no facts. And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth. Not THE truth.

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?