Reply to GA Case

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "GA Case"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]They have provided evidence.  The relationship has been conceded.  That they went on trips is evidence.  Someone testified that the relationship started earlier than when he started contract work for the DA's office.  That is evidence.  This detail I think is irrelevant since the contract was renewed after the point where Willis says the relationship started.

In a criminal trial the prosecution might have to provide evidence her story is false, but that is not needed here.[/quote]

There may be evidence of an ethics violation.  But there is no evidence of a conflict of interest.  [/quote]

If she hired Wade while she was having an affair with him, there would be a conflict of interest. 
At least one witness testified that she was seeing him before she hired him. 
Text messages from Wade's former attorney also reportedly indicate that they were seeing each other prior to her hiring him. 
[/quote]

I don't think you know what conflict of interest means.[/quote]

+1, it would only be a conflict if it was the judge or someone representing the defense. This is nothing but a stupid sideshow that is irrelevant to the facts of this case.[/quote]

I saw a commentator say they need to show 2 things (1) there was an improper gain (so whether or not she benefitted financially, that seems to be a credibility issue) and also (2) how that financial gain resulted in an unfair proceeding. Even if (1) is there, how does that impact the second finding? Or was that commentator not stating the correct elements that must be proven to remove her?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics