Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cellphone records show Wade visited Fani at her home at least 35 times before being appointed as the Special Prosecutor in November of 2021.

The cellphone records show both Fani and Wade testified falsely under oath and would face perjury and fraud on the court charges.

Attorneys can’t introduce evidence. Only witnesses can do that. How are they going to get that into the hearing?

Seems like the private investigator would be the witness to introduce the evidence. He/she collected it.

I still don’t see how this is admissible.

This is not a trial of Willis.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cellphone records show Wade visited Fani at her home at least 35 times before being appointed as the Special Prosecutor in November of 2021.

The cellphone records show both Fani and Wade testified falsely under oath and would face perjury and fraud on the court charges.

Attorneys can’t introduce evidence. Only witnesses can do that. How are they going to get that into the hearing?

Seems like the private investigator would be the witness to introduce the evidence. He/she collected it.

I still don’t see how this is admissible.

I think you want something like this:

Prosecution team: "Your honor, we object on behalf of Fani Willis to any and all evidence that may be construed as being adverse or contradictory to our evidence."

Judge: Turns to defense team and says, "Hm, uh well, so tell me why is it that you do not agree with the State's Assertion because I don't see how you can disagree".

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cellphone records show Wade visited Fani at her home at least 35 times before being appointed as the Special Prosecutor in November of 2021.

The cellphone records show both Fani and Wade testified falsely under oath and would face perjury and fraud on the court charges.

Attorneys can’t introduce evidence. Only witnesses can do that. How are they going to get that into the hearing?

Seems like the private investigator would be the witness to introduce the evidence. He/she collected it.

I still don’t see how this is admissible.

Anonymous wrote:Shows up after midnight. Leaves before sun up. Sounds like a serious relationship to me 😆 🤣 😂

They were simply working. Nothing romantic or sexual going on in her condo.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cellphone records show Wade visited Fani at her home at least 35 times before being appointed as the Special Prosecutor in November of 2021.

The cellphone records show both Fani and Wade testified falsely under oath and would face perjury and fraud on the court charges.

Attorneys can’t introduce evidence. Only witnesses can do that. How are they going to get that into the hearing?

Seems like the private investigator would be the witness to introduce the evidence. He/she collected it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the cellphone records' time/date stamp, Wade would typically arrive at Fani's place late at night and leave early in the morning in 2021 prior to when Nathan/Fani testified under oath in Court and on affidavit/pleadings that they began their romantic relationship.

Perfect example of why a DA needs to use cash when they travel. They are being cyber-stalked by the targets of their investigations. It is a whisper away from threating bodily harm and simply terrifying.

LOL. Nice try.
It is actually a perfect example of why a DA should not be having an affair with someone she hires. And, then allegedly lying about it.
She knew this wasn't appropriate..... she even said so during her campaign.

Shows up after midnight. Leaves before sun up. Sounds like a serious relationship to me 😆 🤣 😂

Anonymous wrote:According to the cellphone records' time/date stamp, Wade would typically arrive at Fani's place late at night and leave early in the morning in 2021 prior to when Nathan/Fani testified under oath in Court and on affidavit/pleadings that they began their romantic relationship.

Perfect example of why a DA needs to use cash when they travel. They are being cyber-stalked by the targets of their investigations. It is a whisper away from threating bodily harm and simply terrifying.

Anonymous wrote:This corrupt judge tried to hide his former relationship with Fani and the money he and his wife gave to Fani violates the duty of every Georgia Judge to avoid even the "appearance of impropriety" (forget the impropriety) under the Georgia Canons of Judicial Ethics".

How did he hide it? Campaign contributions are public.

Anonymous wrote:Cellphone records show Wade visited Fani at her home at least 35 times before being appointed as the Special Prosecutor in November of 2021.

The cellphone records show both Fani and Wade testified falsely under oath and would face perjury and fraud on the court charges.

Attorneys can’t introduce evidence. Only witnesses can do that. How are they going to get that into the hearing?

According to the cellphone records' time/date stamp, Wade would typically arrive at Fani's place late at night and leave early in the morning in 2021 prior to when Nathan/Fani testified under oath in Court and on affidavit/pleadings that they began their romantic relationship.

Anonymous wrote:This corrupt judge tried to hide his former relationship with Fani and the money he and his wife gave to Fani violates the duty of every Georgia Judge to avoid even the "appearance of impropriety" (forget the impropriety) under the Georgia Canons of Judicial Ethics".

Trump is throwing light on all the cockroaches. This is a national service. The man is awesome .

This corrupt judge tried to hide his former relationship with Fani and the money he and his wife gave to Fani violates the duty of every Georgia Judge to avoid even the "appearance of impropriety" (forget the impropriety) under the Georgia Canons of Judicial Ethics".

Breaking: 2,000+ calls, 12,000 texts alleged between DA Fani Willis, special prosecutor:

ATLANTA, Ga. (Atlanta News First) - A private investigator hired by former President Donald Trump’s Georgia attorneys allege more than 2,000 phone calls and just under 12,000 text messages took place between Fulton County DA Fani Willis and her special prosecutor before he was hired.

On Friday, Trump attorneys Steve Sadow and Jennifer Little filed an affidavit in Fulton County Superior Court from Charles Mittelstadt, a 59-year-old criminal defense investigator hired to provide a voice call/text history for Nathan Wade.

Wade and Willis engaged in a now-acknowledged romantic relationship, but the couple claim their relationship began after Willis hired Wade to assist in her investigation and subsequent indictment of Trump and other Republicans.

Using a cellular geo-mapping and analysis program called CellHawk, Mittlestadt’s report revealed “more than 2,000 voice calls and just under 12,000 text messages exchanged over the 11-month period in 2021,” Friday’s court filing said. “A heat map ... highlights the interaction patterns which demonstrate a prevalence of calls made in the evening hours.”

The analysis appears to indicate Willis and Wade were communicating extensively before they say their romantic relationship began.

The report also indicates Wade made at least 35 visits to the Hapeville, Georgia, condo in which Willis was living at the time, a property owned by Robin Yeartie, whose testimony last week rocked the two-day hearing. Yeartie testified that Willis’ and wade’s relationship began before Willis hired Wade.

Wade testified last week he’d visited Willis at the condo no more than 10 times before he was hired in November 2021. Middelstadt’s report alleges Wade twice arrived late at night at the condo and left early the next morning, again before the couple said their romantic relationship began.

https://www.atlantanewsfirst.com/2024/02/23/2000-calls-12000-texts-alleged-between-da-fani-willis-special-prosecutor/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They have provided evidence. The relationship has been conceded. That they went on trips is evidence. Someone testified that the relationship started earlier than when he started contract work for the DA's office. That is evidence. This detail I think is irrelevant since the contract was renewed after the point where Willis says the relationship started.

In a criminal trial the prosecution might have to provide evidence her story is false, but that is not needed here.

There may be evidence of an ethics violation. But there is no evidence of a conflict of interest.

If she hired Wade while she was having an affair with him, there would be a conflict of interest.
At least one witness testified that she was seeing him before she hired him.
Text messages from Wade's former attorney also reportedly indicate that they were seeing each other prior to her hiring him.

I don't think you know what conflict of interest means.

+1, it would only be a conflict if it was the judge or someone representing the defense. This is nothing but a stupid sideshow that is irrelevant to the facts of this case.

I saw a commentator say they need to show 2 things (1) there was an improper gain (so whether or not she benefitted financially, that seems to be a credibility issue) and also (2) how that financial gain resulted in an unfair proceeding. Even if (1) is there, how does that impact the second finding? Or was that commentator not stating the correct elements that must be proven to remove her?