Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "House of Representatives 2026"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://x.com/covie_93/status/2029027214822428916?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg[/twitter][/quote] This will go to a runoff. The more runoffs Republicans have the better chance Democrats have of flipping the seats. [/quote] YES you are correct, on both points. [twitter]https://x.com/redistrict/status/2029046446989713440?s=61&t=I7ZozTDGmPOsC7cmSRxwgA[/twitter][/quote] The Democrat in Texas’s 23rd doesn’t have a runoff, and 3,000 more Democrats than Republicans voted in this district. [twitter]https://x.com/cjwarnke/status/2029248420175614128?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg[/twitter][/quote] Tony Gonzales has withdrawn from the race. The Republicans were successful in getting him to job his bid for reelection. No runoff [/quote] So according to Republicans, an affair with a subordinate is disqualifying for representing the district in 2027 but they have no issue with him representing the district right now.[/quote] They don’t care that he had an affair. Their messiah was married three times and had continuous affairs throughout each marriage, including with underage girls and porn stars. It’s NBD, Trump normalized that for them. The problem is the affair partner lit a match to herself and died. That’s the issue. Maybe had Stormie Daniels or one of the multitude of Trump’s affair partners iced herself, or more accurately lit a fire as she was doused in accelerant, we wouldn’t have such a despicable and foul person as CIC. [/quote] My point was, whatever he did, the party finds it disqualifying for serving in 2027 but not for serving right now. If something is disqualifying then it should be disqualifying, period. But Mike Johnson can't afford to lose one vote even for the few months it would take for a special election to replace him.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics