Reply to What are your honest opinions of Camilla Parker Bowles today in 2022 ?

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "What are your honest opinions of Camilla Parker Bowles today in 2022 ?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]"And when, in the fullness of time, my son Charles becomes King, I know you will give him and his wife Camilla the same support that you have given me; and it is my sincere wish that, when that time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort as she continues her own loyal service."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/05/uk/queen-elizabeth-ii-platinum-jubilee-accession-day-gbr-intl/index.html[/quote]

Diana would have been gutted. She would be in her third or or fourth marriage to a middle eastern cokehead and Camilla will be Queen consort.   [/quote]

Camilla the mistress would have never married Charles - Diana would have made sure of it. The fact that he had to wait a further 8 years after her death to be able to marry a woman he'd been tipping since the 70s proves it.

Diana would have been living a glamorous life in New York City and in London just like Jackie Onassis. Charles was being out-maneuvered legally and publicly which is why he gave her $18 million in the divorce and then she was dead a year later.[/quote]

It’s kinda sweet that you think Diana had power with the royal family.   Look at how they cut out an actual king and member of their family and then how Harry and Meghan were cut loose.

Diana was dead to them no matter how much you think she had power.  Her worse action was to cross Philip.   [/quote]

A) She didn't cross Phillip - Phillip considered Charles a disgrace and a sniveling coward. He even said in writing "I can't imagine anyone leaving you for Camilla". Charles choices were never his and the father had much better taste.

B) Diana was a daughter of one the oldest families in Britain and the mother of the future King. She wasn't 'dead' to anybody until they put in her in the ground. Before that Charles would have had to share custody, visitation, and all the major ceremonies of William's life with her. Better believe she would have relished that. [/quote]

Philip famously tried to help her and when she cut off communications with him, he dropped her.  He ran the Firm and she strayed away from his authority.

If she was so involved in the life if the future king, why was she on the fourth week away from him when she died?   She would have been at his wedding but not near the royal family.  She would have also played her card of upstaging the royal  family at every event in which William was involved. How long would that play with the public.  William also has a wife that outshines Diane in poise and style.   Diane’s sisters did not age well.  Unless became addicted to plastic surgery as she did to other things, she would not be the 36 year old attractive woman that the paps loved.

[/quote]

So better off she’s dead? Really?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics