Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"And when, in the fullness of time, my son Charles becomes King, I know you will give him and his wife Camilla the same support that you have given me; and it is my sincere wish that, when that time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort as she continues her own loyal service."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/05/uk/queen-elizabeth-ii-platinum-jubilee-accession-day-gbr-intl/index.html

Diana would have been gutted. She would be in her third or or fourth marriage to a middle eastern cokehead and Camilla will be Queen consort.

Or maybe she would have married Hasnat Khan, had a few more kids, and reached the point where she no longer feared that she might be killed if the future king of England had non-white, possibly Muslim, siblings.

Khan dropped her and Diana embarrassed herself by throwing herself at him. In fact he returned to Pakistan so that he would not be involved in the drama after Diana’s death. He also said he would not marry her because of cultural differences. He respected her charitable work snd probably thought it was fun to boff her, but she would never be his wife. You have little understanding of the Middle Eastern male mind if you think most Muslim men would want to procreate with Diana. She had her virgin moment with Charles and was not recreating it for a Muslim man.

Don't be silly. Thousands of Middle Eastern men have married and procreated with Western women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Camilla seems fine, and like a good match and a non-whiner. If snitty critical beasts hate her for acts they weren’t privy to 35 years ago, more power to her.

Nah-- see is an awful hag who openly (with Charles' help) ruined his family + hers. They act so entitled just because Charles' mom accidentally became queen cause her uncle cheated + her dud dad became king.

No one cares. The nonagenarian who might have cared have a public blessing. So Camilla got what she wanted, the world keeps spinning, and at least one of the kids who would seem justified in disliking her, William, seems fine. I know certain people need to believe that that is all like so unfair and entitled and cheaters and slurs and OMG but - they wound up together, and got what they wanted. Shrug, I guess.

16 pages of discussion suggests that people do care. Maybe you don't care, in which case you can find other threads to read. But you chose to respond to this one so...sounds like you care too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"And when, in the fullness of time, my son Charles becomes King, I know you will give him and his wife Camilla the same support that you have given me; and it is my sincere wish that, when that time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort as she continues her own loyal service."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/05/uk/queen-elizabeth-ii-platinum-jubilee-accession-day-gbr-intl/index.html

Diana would have been gutted. She would be in her third or or fourth marriage to a middle eastern cokehead and Camilla will be Queen consort.

Or maybe she would have married Hasnat Khan, had a few more kids, and reached the point where she no longer feared that she might be killed if the future king of England had non-white, possibly Muslim, siblings.

Khan dropped her and Diana embarrassed herself by throwing herself at him. In fact he returned to Pakistan so that he would not be involved in the drama after Diana’s death. He also said he would not marry her because of cultural differences. He respected her charitable work snd probably thought it was fun to boff her, but she would never be his wife. You have little understanding of the Middle Eastern male mind if you think most Muslim men would want to procreate with Diana. She had her virgin moment with Charles and was not recreating it for a Muslim man.

Anonymous wrote:Camilla seems fine, and like a good match and a non-whiner. If snitty critical beasts hate her for acts they weren’t privy to 35 years ago, more power to her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What are the odds she abdicates this year?

Zero. Unless by abdicate you mean she passes away.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"And when, in the fullness of time, my son Charles becomes King, I know you will give him and his wife Camilla the same support that you have given me; and it is my sincere wish that, when that time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort as she continues her own loyal service."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/05/uk/queen-elizabeth-ii-platinum-jubilee-accession-day-gbr-intl/index.html

Diana would have been gutted. She would be in her third or or fourth marriage to a middle eastern cokehead and Camilla will be Queen consort.

Camilla the mistress would have never married Charles - Diana would have made sure of it. The fact that he had to wait a further 8 years after her death to be able to marry a woman he'd been tipping since the 70s proves it.

Diana would have been living a glamorous life in New York City and in London just like Jackie Onassis. Charles was being out-maneuvered legally and publicly which is why he gave her $18 million in the divorce and then she was dead a year later.

It’s kinda sweet that you think Diana had power with the royal family. Look at how they cut out an actual king and member of their family and then how Harry and Meghan were cut loose.

Diana was dead to them no matter how much you think she had power. Her worse action was to cross Philip.

A) She didn't cross Phillip - Phillip considered Charles a disgrace and a sniveling coward. He even said in writing "I can't imagine anyone leaving you for Camilla". Charles choices were never his and the father had much better taste.

B) Diana was a daughter of one the oldest families in Britain and the mother of the future King. She wasn't 'dead' to anybody until they put in her in the ground. Before that Charles would have had to share custody, visitation, and all the major ceremonies of William's life with her. Better believe she would have relished that.

Philip famously tried to help her and when she cut off communications with him, he dropped her. He ran the Firm and she strayed away from his authority.

If she was so involved in the life if the future king, why was she on the fourth week away from him when she died? She would have been at his wedding but not near the royal family. She would have also played her card of upstaging the royal family at every event in which William was involved. How long would that play with the public. William also has a wife that outshines Diane in poise and style. Diane’s sisters did not age well. Unless became addicted to plastic surgery as she did to other things, she would not be the 36 year old attractive woman that the paps loved.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Camilla seems fine, and like a good match and a non-whiner. If snitty critical beasts hate her for acts they weren’t privy to 35 years ago, more power to her.

Nah-- see is an awful hag who openly (with Charles' help) ruined his family + hers. They act so entitled just because Charles' mom accidentally became queen cause her uncle cheated + her dud dad became king.

No one cares. The nonagenarian who might have cared have a public blessing. So Camilla got what she wanted, the world keeps spinning, and at least one of the kids who would seem justified in disliking her, William, seems fine. I know certain people need to believe that that is all like so unfair and entitled and cheaters and slurs and OMG but - they wound up together, and got what they wanted. Shrug, I guess.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Camilla seems fine, and like a good match and a non-whiner. If snitty critical beasts hate her for acts they weren’t privy to 35 years ago, more power to her.

Nah-- see is an awful hag who openly (with Charles' help) ruined his family + hers. They act so entitled just because Charles' mom accidentally became queen cause her uncle cheated + her dud dad became king.

Anonymous wrote:Camilla seems fine, and like a good match and a non-whiner. If snitty critical beasts hate her for acts they weren’t privy to 35 years ago, more power to her.

Anonymous wrote:What are the odds she abdicates this year?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"And when, in the fullness of time, my son Charles becomes King, I know you will give him and his wife Camilla the same support that you have given me; and it is my sincere wish that, when that time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort as she continues her own loyal service."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/05/uk/queen-elizabeth-ii-platinum-jubilee-accession-day-gbr-intl/index.html

Diana would have been gutted. She would be in her third or or fourth marriage to a middle eastern cokehead and Camilla will be Queen consort.

Or maybe she would have married Hasnat Khan, had a few more kids, and reached the point where she no longer feared that she might be killed if the future king of England had non-white, possibly Muslim, siblings.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"And when, in the fullness of time, my son Charles becomes King, I know you will give him and his wife Camilla the same support that you have given me; and it is my sincere wish that, when that time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort as she continues her own loyal service."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/05/uk/queen-elizabeth-ii-platinum-jubilee-accession-day-gbr-intl/index.html

Diana would have been gutted. She would be in her third or or fourth marriage to a middle eastern cokehead and Camilla will be Queen consort.

Camilla the mistress would have never married Charles - Diana would have made sure of it. The fact that he had to wait a further 8 years after her death to be able to marry a woman he'd been tipping since the 70s proves it.

Diana would have been living a glamorous life in New York City and in London just like Jackie Onassis. Charles was being out-maneuvered legally and publicly which is why he gave her $18 million in the divorce and then she was dead a year later.

It’s kinda sweet that you think Diana had power with the royal family. Look at how they cut out an actual king and member of their family and then how Harry and Meghan were cut loose.

Diana was dead to them no matter how much you think she had power. Her worse action was to cross Philip.

A) She didn't cross Phillip - Phillip considered Charles a disgrace and a sniveling coward. He even said in writing "I can't imagine anyone leaving you for Camilla". Charles choices were never his and the father had much better taste.

B) Diana was a daughter of one the oldest families in Britain and the mother of the future King. She wasn't 'dead' to anybody until they put in her in the ground. Before that Charles would have had to share custody, visitation, and all the major ceremonies of William's life with her. Better believe she would have relished that.

Philip famously tried to help her and when she cut off communications with him, he dropped her. He ran the Firm and she strayed away from his authority.

If she was so involved in the life if the future king, why was she on the fourth week away from him when she died? She would have been at his wedding but not near the royal family. She would have also played her card of upstaging the royal family at every event in which William was involved. How long would that play with the public. William also has a wife that outshines Diane in poise and style. Diane’s sisters did not age well. Unless became addicted to plastic surgery as she did to other things, she would not be the 36 year old attractive woman that the paps loved.